mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Li Aubrey <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu()
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 17:18:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210114171818.GO3592@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtCCjsJG8G5EQfdyLgiaQUqZFiapRGtrP8wTP7k-6qvSxQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:44:46PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > domain. There is no need to make it specific to the core account and we
> > are already doing the full scan. Throttling that would be a separate patch.
> >
> > > This patch 5 should focus on merging select_idle_core and
> > > select_idle_cpu so we keep (almost) the same behavior but each CPU is
> > > checked only once.
> > >
> >
> > Which I think it's already doing. Main glitch really is that
> > __select_idle_cpu() shouldn't be taking *idle_cpu as it does not consume
> > the information.
> 
>  don't really like the if (smt) else in the for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu,
> cpus, target) loop  because it just looks like we fail to merge idle
> core and idle cpu search loop at the end.
> 

While it's not the best, I did at one point have a series that fully
unified this function and it wasn't pretty.

> But there is probably not much we can do without changing what is
> accounted idle core  search in the avg_scan_cost
> 

Indeed. Maybe in the future it'll make more sense to consolidate it
further but between the depth search and possibly using SIS_PROP core
core searches, we've bigger fish to fry.

Current delta between this series and what is being tested is simply

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 7bfa73de6a8d..ada8faac2e4d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7446,7 +7446,6 @@ int sched_cpu_activate(unsigned int cpu)
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
 	do {
 		int weight = cpumask_weight(cpu_smt_mask(cpu));
-		extern int sched_smt_weight;
 
 		if (weight > sched_smt_weight)
 			sched_smt_weight = weight;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 84f02abb29e3..6c0f841e9e75 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6006,7 +6006,7 @@ static inline int find_idlest_cpu(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p
 	return new_cpu;
 }
 
-static inline int __select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpus, int *idle_cpu)
+static inline int __select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpus)
 {
 	if (available_idle_cpu(core) || sched_idle_cpu(core))
 		return core;
@@ -6080,7 +6080,7 @@ static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpu
 	int cpu;
 
 	if (!static_branch_likely(&sched_smt_present))
-		return __select_idle_cpu(p, core, cpus, idle_cpu);
+		return __select_idle_cpu(p, core, cpus);
 
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_smt_mask(core)) {
 		if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu)) {
@@ -6120,7 +6120,7 @@ static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def)
 
 static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpus, int *idle_cpu)
 {
-	return __select_idle_cpu(p, core, cpus, idle_cpu);
+	return __select_idle_cpu(p, core, cpus);
 }
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
@@ -6177,7 +6177,7 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
 				return i;
 
 		} else {
-			i = __select_idle_cpu(p, cpu, cpus, &idle_cpu);
+			i = __select_idle_cpu(p, cpu, cpus);
 			if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits) {
 				idle_cpu = i;
 				break;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 12ada79d40f3..29aabe98dd1d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1107,6 +1107,8 @@ static inline void update_idle_core(struct rq *rq)
 		__update_idle_core(rq);
 }
 
+extern int sched_smt_weight;
+
 #else
 static inline void update_idle_core(struct rq *rq) { }
 #endif
-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-14 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-11 15:50 [PATCH 0/5] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Mel Gorman
2021-01-11 15:50 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Remove SIS_AVG_CPU Mel Gorman
2021-01-11 15:50 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: Move avg_scan_cost calculations under SIS_PROP Mel Gorman
2021-01-11 15:50 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Make select_idle_cpu() proportional to cores Mel Gorman
2021-01-13 16:49   ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-14  9:28     ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-11 15:50 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Remove select_idle_smt() Mel Gorman
2021-01-11 15:50 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu() Mel Gorman
2021-01-13 17:03   ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-14  9:35     ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-14 13:25       ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-14 13:53         ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-14 15:44           ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-14 17:18             ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2021-01-15 10:08 [PATCH v2 0/5] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Mel Gorman
2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu() Mel Gorman
2021-01-18 12:55   ` Li, Aubrey
2021-01-18 14:41     ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-19 11:22 [PATCH v3 0/5] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Mel Gorman
2021-01-19 11:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu() Mel Gorman
2021-01-20  8:30   ` Gautham R Shenoy
2021-01-20  9:12     ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-20  9:21       ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-20  9:54         ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-20  9:58           ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-20 13:55           ` Gautham R Shenoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210114171818.GO3592@techsingularity.net \
    --to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome