From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Li Aubrey <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu()
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 17:18:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210114171818.GO3592@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtCCjsJG8G5EQfdyLgiaQUqZFiapRGtrP8wTP7k-6qvSxQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 04:44:46PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > domain. There is no need to make it specific to the core account and we
> > are already doing the full scan. Throttling that would be a separate patch.
> >
> > > This patch 5 should focus on merging select_idle_core and
> > > select_idle_cpu so we keep (almost) the same behavior but each CPU is
> > > checked only once.
> > >
> >
> > Which I think it's already doing. Main glitch really is that
> > __select_idle_cpu() shouldn't be taking *idle_cpu as it does not consume
> > the information.
>
> don't really like the if (smt) else in the for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu,
> cpus, target) loop because it just looks like we fail to merge idle
> core and idle cpu search loop at the end.
>
While it's not the best, I did at one point have a series that fully
unified this function and it wasn't pretty.
> But there is probably not much we can do without changing what is
> accounted idle core search in the avg_scan_cost
>
Indeed. Maybe in the future it'll make more sense to consolidate it
further but between the depth search and possibly using SIS_PROP core
core searches, we've bigger fish to fry.
Current delta between this series and what is being tested is simply
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 7bfa73de6a8d..ada8faac2e4d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7446,7 +7446,6 @@ int sched_cpu_activate(unsigned int cpu)
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
do {
int weight = cpumask_weight(cpu_smt_mask(cpu));
- extern int sched_smt_weight;
if (weight > sched_smt_weight)
sched_smt_weight = weight;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 84f02abb29e3..6c0f841e9e75 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6006,7 +6006,7 @@ static inline int find_idlest_cpu(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p
return new_cpu;
}
-static inline int __select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpus, int *idle_cpu)
+static inline int __select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpus)
{
if (available_idle_cpu(core) || sched_idle_cpu(core))
return core;
@@ -6080,7 +6080,7 @@ static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpu
int cpu;
if (!static_branch_likely(&sched_smt_present))
- return __select_idle_cpu(p, core, cpus, idle_cpu);
+ return __select_idle_cpu(p, core, cpus);
for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_smt_mask(core)) {
if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu)) {
@@ -6120,7 +6120,7 @@ static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def)
static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpus, int *idle_cpu)
{
- return __select_idle_cpu(p, core, cpus, idle_cpu);
+ return __select_idle_cpu(p, core, cpus);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
@@ -6177,7 +6177,7 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
return i;
} else {
- i = __select_idle_cpu(p, cpu, cpus, &idle_cpu);
+ i = __select_idle_cpu(p, cpu, cpus);
if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits) {
idle_cpu = i;
break;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 12ada79d40f3..29aabe98dd1d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1107,6 +1107,8 @@ static inline void update_idle_core(struct rq *rq)
__update_idle_core(rq);
}
+extern int sched_smt_weight;
+
#else
static inline void update_idle_core(struct rq *rq) { }
#endif
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-14 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-11 15:50 [PATCH 0/5] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Mel Gorman
2021-01-11 15:50 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Remove SIS_AVG_CPU Mel Gorman
2021-01-11 15:50 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: Move avg_scan_cost calculations under SIS_PROP Mel Gorman
2021-01-11 15:50 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Make select_idle_cpu() proportional to cores Mel Gorman
2021-01-13 16:49 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-14 9:28 ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-11 15:50 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Remove select_idle_smt() Mel Gorman
2021-01-11 15:50 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu() Mel Gorman
2021-01-13 17:03 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-14 9:35 ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-14 13:25 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-14 13:53 ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-14 15:44 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-14 17:18 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2021-01-15 10:08 [PATCH v2 0/5] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Mel Gorman
2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu() Mel Gorman
2021-01-18 12:55 ` Li, Aubrey
2021-01-18 14:41 ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-19 11:22 [PATCH v3 0/5] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Mel Gorman
2021-01-19 11:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu() Mel Gorman
2021-01-20 8:30 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2021-01-20 9:12 ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-20 9:21 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-20 9:54 ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-20 9:58 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-20 13:55 ` Gautham R Shenoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210114171818.GO3592@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome