From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Make select_idle_cpu() proportional to cores
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:27:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210118092743.GP3592@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9036411-39d0-2c28-aec5-5e185d01d3f0@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 04:14:36PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> > <SNIP>
> > @@ -6124,6 +6126,8 @@ static int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
> >
> > #else /* CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
> >
> > +#define sched_smt_weight 1
> > +
> > static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
> > {
> > return -1;
> >
> > <SNIP>
> >
> > @@ -6166,10 +6172,12 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
> > avg_cost = this_sd->avg_scan_cost + 1;
> >
> > span_avg = sd->span_weight * avg_idle;
> > - if (span_avg > 4*avg_cost)
> > + if (span_avg > sis_min_cores*avg_cost)
> > nr = div_u64(span_avg, avg_cost);
> > else
> > - nr = 4;
> > + nr = sis_min_cores;
> > +
> > + nr *= sched_smt_weight;
>
> Is it better to put this into an inline wrapper to hide sched_smt_weight if !CONFIG_SCHED_SMT?
>
There already is a #define sched_smt_weight for !CONFIG_SCHED_SMT and I
do not think an inline wrapper would make it more readable or maintainable.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-18 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-15 10:08 [PATCH v2 0/5] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Mel Gorman
2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Remove SIS_AVG_CPU Mel Gorman
2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: Move avg_scan_cost calculations under SIS_PROP Mel Gorman
2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Make select_idle_cpu() proportional to cores Mel Gorman
2021-01-18 8:14 ` Li, Aubrey
2021-01-18 9:27 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Remove select_idle_smt() Mel Gorman
2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu() Mel Gorman
2021-01-18 12:55 ` Li, Aubrey
2021-01-18 14:41 ` Mel Gorman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-01-19 11:22 [PATCH v3 0/5] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Mel Gorman
2021-01-19 11:22 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Make select_idle_cpu() proportional to cores Mel Gorman
2021-01-11 15:50 [PATCH 0/5] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Mel Gorman
2021-01-11 15:50 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Make select_idle_cpu() proportional to cores Mel Gorman
2021-01-13 16:49 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-14 9:28 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210118092743.GP3592@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome