From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E54EC4332B for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4382371F for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2392896AbhAUAQE (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 19:16:04 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53654 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390992AbhATXQ4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 18:16:56 -0500 Received: from zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk (zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2607:5300:60:148a::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6209C061349 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:14:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from viro by zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l2MgR-0041Ne-2x; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 23:14:39 +0000 Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 23:14:39 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Johannes Berg , Oliver Giles , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: Splicing to/from a tty Message-ID: <20210120231439.GE740243@zeniv-ca> References: <20210118085311.GA2735@lst.de> <20210118193457.GA736435@zeniv-ca> <20210118195400.GC736435@zeniv-ca> <20210120162608.GB740243@zeniv-ca> <20210120191116.GC740243@zeniv-ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: Al Viro Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:27:26AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:11 AM Al Viro wrote: > > > > Why do we care about O_APPEND on anything without FMODE_PWRITE (including > > pipes), anyway? All writes there ignore position, after all... > > We shouldn't care. > > Also, I think we should try to move away from FMODE_PWRITE/PREAD > entirely, and use FMODE_STREAM as the primary "this thing doesn't have > a position at all". > > That's what gets rid of all the f_pos locking etc after all. The > FMODE_PWRITE/PREAD flags are I think legacy (although we do seem to > have the seq_file case that normally allows position on reads, but not > on writes, so we may need to keep all three bits). Umm... Why do we clear FMODE_PWRITE there, anyway? It came in commit 915a29ec1c5e34283a6231af1036114e4d612cb0 Author: Linus Torvalds Date: Sat Aug 7 02:08:23 2004 -0700 Add pread/pwrite support bits to match the lseek bit. This also removes the ESPIPE logic from pipes and seq_files, since the VFS layer now supports it. with seq_read() losing the special-cased pread prevention and seq_open() getting a ban on both pread and pwrite. With pread() support added in 2009, and (pointless) pwrite prohibition left in place.