From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Oleksandr Mazur <oleksandr.mazur@plvision.eu>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"jiri@nvidia.com" <jiri@nvidia.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: core: devlink: add new trap action HARD_DROP
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 18:03:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210123160348.GB2799851@shredder.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM0P190MB073828252FFDA3215387765CE4A00@AM0P190MB0738.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 08:36:01AM +0000, Oleksandr Mazur wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:21:52 +0200 Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 01:29:37PM +0200, Oleksandr Mazur wrote:
> > > Add new trap action HARD_DROP, which can be used by the
> > > drivers to register traps, where it's impossible to get
> > > packet reported to the devlink subsystem by the device
> > > driver, because it's impossible to retrieve dropped packet
> > > from the device itself.
> > > In order to use this action, driver must also register
> > > additional devlink operation - callback that is used
> > > to retrieve number of packets that have been dropped by
> > > the device.
> >
> > Are these global statistics about number of packets the hardware dropped
> > for a specific reason or are these per-port statistics?
> >
> > It's a creative use of devlink-trap interface, but I think it makes
> > sense. Better to re-use an existing interface than creating yet another
> > one.
>
> > Not sure if I agree, if we can't trap why is it a trap?
> > It's just a counter.
>
> It's just another ACTION for trap item. Action however can be switched, e.g. from HARD_DROP to MIRROR.
>
> The thing is to be able to configure specific trap to be dropped, and provide a way for the device to report back how many packets have been dropped.
> If device is able to report the packet itself, then devlink would be in charge of counting. If not, there should be a way to retrieve these statistics from the devlink.
So no need for another action. Just report these stats via
'DEVLINK_ATTR_STATS_RX_DROPPED' if the hardware supports it.
Currently you do:
+static int
+devlink_trap_hard_drop_stats_put(struct sk_buff *msg,
+ struct devlink *devlink,
+ const struct devlink_trap_item *trap_item)
+{
+ struct nlattr *attr;
+ u64 drops;
+ int err;
+
+ err = devlink->ops->trap_hard_drop_counter_get(devlink, trap_item->trap,
+ &drops);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ attr = nla_nest_start(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_STATS);
+ if (!attr)
+ return -EMSGSIZE;
+
+ if (nla_put_u64_64bit(msg, DEVLINK_ATTR_STATS_RX_DROPPED, drops,
+ DEVLINK_ATTR_PAD))
+ goto nla_put_failure;
+
+ nla_nest_end(msg, attr);
+
+ return 0;
+
+nla_put_failure:
+ nla_nest_cancel(msg, attr);
+ return -EMSGSIZE;
+}
+
static int devlink_nl_trap_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink,
const struct devlink_trap_item *trap_item,
enum devlink_command cmd, u32 portid, u32 seq,
@@ -6857,7 +6889,10 @@ static int devlink_nl_trap_fill(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink,
if (err)
goto nla_put_failure;
- err = devlink_trap_stats_put(msg, trap_item->stats);
+ if (trap_item->action == DEVLINK_TRAP_ACTION_HARD_DROP)
+ err = devlink_trap_hard_drop_stats_put(msg, devlink, trap_item);
+ else
+ err = devlink_trap_stats_put(msg, trap_item->stats);
if (err)
goto nla_put_failure;
Which means that user space will see stats come and go based on the
trap's action. That's not desirable. Instead, change:
[DEVLINK_ATTR_STATS]
[DEVLINK_ATTR_STATS_RX_PACKETS]
[DEVLINK_ATTR_STATS_RX_BYTES]
To:
[DEVLINK_ATTR_STATS]
[DEVLINK_ATTR_STATS_RX_PACKETS]
[DEVLINK_ATTR_STATS_RX_BYTES]
[DEVLINK_ATTR_STATS_RX_DROPPED]
Where the last attribute is reported to user space for devices that
support such stats. No changes required in uAPI / iproute2.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-23 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-22 8:36 Oleksandr Mazur
2021-01-23 1:12 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-23 16:03 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2021-01-23 20:14 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-24 8:45 ` Ido Schimmel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-01-21 11:29 Oleksandr Mazur
2021-01-21 12:21 ` Ido Schimmel
2021-01-21 17:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-25 12:12 ` Jiri Pirko
2021-01-25 12:24 ` Oleksandr Mazur
2021-01-25 14:56 ` Jiri Pirko
2021-01-25 17:40 ` Ido Schimmel
2021-01-22 8:30 ` Oleksandr Mazur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210123160348.GB2799851@shredder.lan \
--to=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleksandr.mazur@plvision.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®