From: Changheun Lee <nanich.lee@samsung.com>
To: damien.lemoal@wdc.com
Cc: Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com, asml.silence@gmail.com,
axboe@kernel.dk, jisoo2146.oh@samsung.com,
junho89.kim@samsung.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ming.lei@redhat.com,
mj0123.lee@samsung.com, nanich.lee@samsung.com, osandov@fb.com,
patchwork-bot@kernel.org, seunghwan.hyun@samsung.com,
sookwan7.kim@samsung.com, tj@kernel.org, tom.leiming@gmail.com,
woosung2.lee@samsung.com, yt0928.kim@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] bio: limit bio max size
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:21:13 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210127002113.8280-1-nanich.lee@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BL0PR04MB65147D829369D0E6B45507E0E7BC9@BL0PR04MB6514.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
> On 2021/01/26 18:37, Changheun Lee wrote:
> > bio size can grow up to 4GB when muli-page bvec is enabled.
> > but sometimes it would lead to inefficient behaviors.
> > in case of large chunk direct I/O, - 32MB chunk read in user space -
> > all pages for 32MB would be merged to a bio structure if the pages
> > physical addresses are contiguous. it makes some delay to submit
> > until merge complete. bio max size should be limited to a proper size.
> >
> > When 32MB chunk read with direct I/O option is coming from userspace,
> > kernel behavior is below now. it's timeline.
> >
> > | bio merge for 32MB. total 8,192 pages are merged.
> > | total elapsed time is over 2ms.
> > |------------------ ... ----------------------->|
> > | 8,192 pages merged a bio.
> > | at this time, first bio submit is done.
> > | 1 bio is split to 32 read request and issue.
> > |--------------->
> > |--------------->
> > |--------------->
> > ......
> > |--------------->
> > |--------------->|
> > total 19ms elapsed to complete 32MB read done from device. |
> >
> > If bio max size is limited with 1MB, behavior is changed below.
> >
> > | bio merge for 1MB. 256 pages are merged for each bio.
> > | total 32 bio will be made.
> > | total elapsed time is over 2ms. it's same.
> > | but, first bio submit timing is fast. about 100us.
> > |--->|--->|--->|---> ... -->|--->|--->|--->|--->|
> > | 256 pages merged a bio.
> > | at this time, first bio submit is done.
> > | and 1 read request is issued for 1 bio.
> > |--------------->
> > |--------------->
> > |--------------->
> > ......
> > |--------------->
> > |--------------->|
> > total 17ms elapsed to complete 32MB read done from device. |
> >
> > As a result, read request issue timing is faster if bio max size is limited.
> > Current kernel behavior with multipage bvec, super large bio can be created.
> > And it lead to delay first I/O request issue.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Changheun Lee <nanich.lee@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > block/bio.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> > include/linux/bio.h | 4 +++-
> > include/linux/blkdev.h | 3 +++
> > 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
> > index 1f2cc1fbe283..ec0281889045 100644
> > --- a/block/bio.c
> > +++ b/block/bio.c
> > @@ -287,6 +287,21 @@ void bio_init(struct bio *bio, struct bio_vec *table,
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_init);
> >
> > +unsigned int bio_max_size(struct bio *bio)
> > +{
> > + struct request_queue *q;
> > +
> > + if (!bio->bi_disk)
> > + return UINT_MAX;
> > +
> > + q = bio->bi_disk->queue;
> > + if (!blk_queue_limit_bio_size(q))
> > + return UINT_MAX;
> > +
> > + return blk_queue_get_max_sectors(q, bio_op(bio)) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_max_size);
>
> Why export this ? This is only used in this file and in bio.h in bio_full().
OK. I'll remove it.
>
> > +
> > /**
> > * bio_reset - reinitialize a bio
> > * @bio: bio to reset
> > @@ -877,7 +892,7 @@ bool __bio_try_merge_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page,
> > struct bio_vec *bv = &bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt - 1];
> >
> > if (page_is_mergeable(bv, page, len, off, same_page)) {
> > - if (bio->bi_iter.bi_size > UINT_MAX - len) {
> > + if (bio->bi_iter.bi_size > bio_max_size(bio) - len) {
> > *same_page = false;
> > return false;
> > }
> > diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
> > index 1edda614f7ce..cdb134ca7bf5 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/bio.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/bio.h
> > @@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ static inline void *bio_data(struct bio *bio)
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > +extern unsigned int bio_max_size(struct bio *);
>
> No need for extern.
It's just for compile warning in my test environment.
I'll remove it too. But I think compile warning could be in the other
.c file which includes bio.h. Is it OK?
>
> > +
> > /**
> > * bio_full - check if the bio is full
> > * @bio: bio to check
> > @@ -113,7 +115,7 @@ static inline bool bio_full(struct bio *bio, unsigned len)
> > if (bio->bi_vcnt >= bio->bi_max_vecs)
> > return true;
> >
> > - if (bio->bi_iter.bi_size > UINT_MAX - len)
> > + if (bio->bi_iter.bi_size > bio_max_size(bio) - len)
> > return true;
> >
> > return false;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> > index f94ee3089e01..3aeab9e7e97b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> > @@ -621,6 +621,7 @@ struct request_queue {
> > #define QUEUE_FLAG_RQ_ALLOC_TIME 27 /* record rq->alloc_time_ns */
> > #define QUEUE_FLAG_HCTX_ACTIVE 28 /* at least one blk-mq hctx is active */
> > #define QUEUE_FLAG_NOWAIT 29 /* device supports NOWAIT */
> > +#define QUEUE_FLAG_LIMIT_BIO_SIZE 30 /* limit bio size */
> >
> > #define QUEUE_FLAG_MQ_DEFAULT ((1 << QUEUE_FLAG_IO_STAT) | \
> > (1 << QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP) | \
> > @@ -667,6 +668,8 @@ bool blk_queue_flag_test_and_set(unsigned int flag, struct request_queue *q);
> > #define blk_queue_fua(q) test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_FUA, &(q)->queue_flags)
> > #define blk_queue_registered(q) test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_REGISTERED, &(q)->queue_flags)
> > #define blk_queue_nowait(q) test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_NOWAIT, &(q)->queue_flags)
> > +#define blk_queue_limit_bio_size(q) \
> > + test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_LIMIT_BIO_SIZE, &(q)->queue_flags)
> >
> > extern void blk_set_pm_only(struct request_queue *q);
> > extern void blk_clear_pm_only(struct request_queue *q);
> >
>
>
> --
> Damien Le Moal
> Western Digital Research
--
Changheun Lee
Samsung Electronics
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-27 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20210126093706epcas1p150e9b57a678f8724fa8ab9eddcec8a42@epcas1p1.samsung.com>
2021-01-26 9:21 ` Changheun Lee
2021-01-26 10:28 ` Damien Le Moal
[not found] ` <CGME20210127003642epcas1p4f167d553fc79ef5029a928550adbebea@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2021-01-27 0:21 ` Changheun Lee [this message]
2021-01-27 1:03 ` Damien Le Moal
[not found] ` <CGME20210127053827epcas1p1e0cda00cdbfdacd5a3ede69c788d6710@epcas1p1.samsung.com>
2021-01-27 5:22 ` Changheun Lee
[not found] <CGME20210126014805epcas1p2c4fc40f01c9c89b0a94ff6cac5408347@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
2021-01-26 1:32 ` Changheun Lee
2021-01-26 3:57 ` Ming Lei
2021-01-26 4:06 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-01-26 6:07 ` Ming Lei
2021-01-26 6:26 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-01-26 11:54 ` Ming Lei
[not found] ` <CGME20210127005900epcas1p2456b0f3321b404995445b8654468c30e@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
2021-01-27 0:43 ` Changheun Lee
2021-01-26 15:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210127002113.8280-1-nanich.lee@samsung.com \
--to=nanich.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=jisoo2146.oh@samsung.com \
--cc=junho89.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=mj0123.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=patchwork-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=seunghwan.hyun@samsung.com \
--cc=sookwan7.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
--cc=woosung2.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=yt0928.kim@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®