From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A962AC433DB for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 22:26:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71BD464DF1 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 22:26:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229692AbhA1W0h (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 17:26:37 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60682 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229658AbhA1W0e (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 17:26:34 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:3a1::42]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCA41C06174A; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 14:25:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from lwn.net (unknown [IPv6:2601:281:8300:104d::5f6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32A5E6173; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 22:25:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 32A5E6173 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1611872754; bh=n3bNCZfvvOgSEPImncNtlfIjxMkprSYkS+VwNzrol2c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=q1ov7O4elzTCF85UBBzc3qJuZsEN4SLnpEfF/o4L42dhLDaKLB/G6utplU/c7qe6c CqztL/IiuueqHrznDWGyK1XgaHpgZc25ZL6Cr9tg0BrvAb7g1fD0xYJboqlk5jrT6o zQ4vEAu7YNUE9MZgkNDfN0pV/CKzubqD440y5DCWpGs1bNOrUYGAZQb2q8XlEmXsdA dIp9PEyWp1t6ErvOTYlvwkmSGugoayXrYMQGsdBj7j6zqsvPo7bzTLdvcq8rPinjaa fc3RYma5OclWjS1dHdAJXcNawdHlm9d1Bjg4oZ39PS0pxZYWeqBESVzm9OnAAOhw5p ttYRFqVZVoAeA== Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:25:53 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Daniel Kiper Cc: Cao jin , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/x86/boot.rst: Correct the example of SETUP_INDIRECT Message-ID: <20210128152553.0dec711e@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20210127125440.ma4ir6w7gqahbxbz@tomti.i.net-space.pl> References: <20210127084911.63438-1-jojing64@gmail.com> <20210127125440.ma4ir6w7gqahbxbz@tomti.i.net-space.pl> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:54:40 +0100 Daniel Kiper wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 04:49:11PM +0800, Cao jin wrote: > > struct setup_data.len is the length of data field. In case of > > SETUP_INDIRECT, it should be sizeof(setup_indirect). > > > > Signed-off-by: Cao jin > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper Applied, thanks. jon