From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-21.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80288C433DB for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 17:34:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593ED60203 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 17:34:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238609AbhBDReQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2021 12:34:16 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36534 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238454AbhBDRbs (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2021 12:31:48 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x54a.google.com (mail-pg1-x54a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::54a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E4E9C06121D for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 09:30:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x54a.google.com with SMTP id v16so2774652pgl.23 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 09:30:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:message-id:mime-version:subject:from:to:cc; bh=toZMlO8L4mNt/+T1e20QDyw4KGTzjt3zo2Fm4Ybrzl0=; b=lFdpJJgP004d3TZEN4lxygIPoEXHnYFjDHiUOuAJto0JAFMLB1RsVQiiZDwNZeDue2 Cc47k6LyBn+zjjYLfHwqcNxnCZKeqBFbEtTbg9+HZpSsYFlz7VV5+hrQa3O5Og7YQUkd cak/rHTHyTctqQkMDNYyUDtrBARvERBvrCitbK05p3YpJD03RU4nhwwaZTThTmcd0iZi JOKRBRH9d2gcuxvBlYM0DzrT05GOYWEWZx7nIkulKrBKn59cN8lrMO1VWS9o0E0lSYat j6IbtzbSUUTN9ZWyl/001YSzjW4G06lmqpIvOjPm8byrrmyJp1ByF/wi2hk4l8mJbxJi LRqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:message-id:mime-version:subject:from :to:cc; bh=toZMlO8L4mNt/+T1e20QDyw4KGTzjt3zo2Fm4Ybrzl0=; b=AHBDfHVLrFAzjoDFui5Sfgpt735CsZo28xBZILdJ9/qpjDt0ec+53Z0TPK4ivLYx5j FUIVeBAlF/x1AfjHTOmAgLhcv2tEPM/62h1Y6PIi6mBV0GcjAXeLEVX1QtGC760UJnEj rdJMSMPB1VrY1LA5k/36NdV+pXPCJN1v4nYXeKsAC+Svbrlbub2QbxHoHa8SvYdsUyLv GHLjkRqlqKddf32zJ2amrQPfG7QZpKgDwMPzvnIifrRapNsXRV29GHLQzokFtb+NKKPS wGnLyAIH+HvoWM7iyAoRY5it9LCRnlNlOMFvpgW8O4xdY4KbwIRCVZNm+tiWq6FRSajR R0gA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5320YtgfNimmN67ozYLFZUcsZ8kzJ3Dhua/PcgisHsYZaHLk3N9a 4yfGhfTZ2oBlqQ+wPif427vi2LJeHDjRig== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzQd64wYLCcP0U72Y1a9WakSWfAC+zRbyPKqXayyOUUVugjawZGIt2pZUUBmVo/hjapvX/iP5ulcwvF6Q== Sender: "dlatypov via sendgmr" X-Received: from dlatypov.svl.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:2cd:202:bd7a:7717:5b5b:de27]) (user=dlatypov job=sendgmr) by 2002:a17:90a:7503:: with SMTP id q3mr32450pjk.79.1612459855804; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 09:30:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 09:30:42 -0800 Message-Id: <20210204173045.1138504-1-dlatypov@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0.365.g02bc693789-goog Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] kunit: support running subsets of test suites from kunit.py From: Daniel Latypov To: brendanhiggins@google.com, davidgow@google.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, Daniel Latypov Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org When using `kunit.py run` to run tests, users must populate a `kunitconfig` file to select the options the tests are hidden behind and all their dependencies. The patch [1] to allow specifying a path to kunitconfig promises to make this nicer as we can have checked in files corresponding to different sets of tests. But it's still annoying 1) when trying to run a subet of tests 2) when you want to run tests that don't have such a pre-existing kunitconfig and selecting all the necessary options is tricky. This patch series aims to alleviate both: 1) `kunit.py run 'my-suite-*'` I.e. use my current kunitconfig, but just run suites that match this glob 2) `kunit.py run --alltests 'my-suite-*'` I.e. use allyesconfig so I don't have to worry about writing a kunitconfig at all. See the first commit message for more details and discussion about future work. This patch series also includes a bugfix for a latent bug that can't be triggered right now but has worse consequences as a result of the changes needed to plumb in this suite name glob. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210201205514.3943096-1-dlatypov@google.com/ --- v1 -> v2: Fix free of `suites` subarray in suite_set. Found by Dan Carpenter and kernel test robot. Daniel Latypov (3): kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites kunit: tool: add support for filtering suites by glob kunit: tool: fix unintentional statefulness in run_kernel() lib/kunit/Kconfig | 1 + lib/kunit/executor.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 21 +++++-- tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py | 6 +- 4 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) base-commit: 88bb507a74ea7d75fa49edd421eaa710a7d80598 -- 2.30.0.365.g02bc693789-goog