From: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
To: tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rdunlap@infradead.org, Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] kernel: irq: Some words replce with better alternatives in the file timings.c
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 17:58:36 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210205122836.1355944-1-unixbhaskar@gmail.com> (raw)
Some spelling fixes and replace with other similar meaning words.
Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
---
kernel/irq/timings.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/timings.c b/kernel/irq/timings.c
index 773b6105c4ae..72f69e3b1e8d 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/timings.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/timings.c
@@ -478,21 +478,21 @@ static inline void irq_timings_store(int irq, struct irqt_stat *irqs, u64 ts)
/*
* The interval type is u64 in order to deal with the same
- * type in our computation, that prevent mindfuck issues with
+ * type in our computation, that prevent mind blowing issues with
* overflow, sign and division.
*/
interval = ts - old_ts;
/*
* The interrupt triggered more than one second apart, that
- * ends the sequence as predictible for our purpose. In this
+ * ends the sequence as predictable for our purpose. In this
* case, assume we have the beginning of a sequence and the
- * timestamp is the first value. As it is impossible to
+ * timestamps is the first value. As it is impossible to
* predict anything at this point, return.
*
- * Note the first timestamp of the sequence will always fall
+ * Note the first timestamps of the sequence will always fall
* in this test because the old_ts is zero. That is what we
- * want as we need another timestamp to compute an interval.
+ * want as we need another timestamps to compute an interval.
*/
if (interval >= NSEC_PER_SEC) {
irqs->count = 0;
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static inline void irq_timings_store(int irq, struct irqt_stat *irqs, u64 ts)
* thus the count is reinitialized.
*
* The array of values **must** be browsed in the time direction, the
- * timestamp must increase between an element and the next one.
+ * timestamps must increase between an element and the next one.
*
* Returns a nanosec time based estimation of the earliest interrupt,
* U64_MAX otherwise.
@@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ u64 irq_timings_next_event(u64 now)
* type but with the cost of extra computation in the
* interrupt handler hot path. We choose efficiency.
*
- * Inject measured irq/timestamp to the pattern prediction
+ * Inject measured irq/timestamps to the pattern prediction
* model while decrementing the counter because we consume the
* data from our circular buffer.
*/
--
2.30.0
next reply other threads:[~2021-02-05 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-05 12:28 Bhaskar Chowdhury [this message]
2021-02-05 18:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-06 0:30 ` Bhaskar Chowdhury
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210205122836.1355944-1-unixbhaskar@gmail.com \
--to=unixbhaskar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome