mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Liu Xiang <liu.xiang@zlingsmart.com>,
	"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	liuxiang_1999@126.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: use REQ_HIPRI flag to complete request directly in own complete workqueue
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 17:22:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210205162221.GA27114@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFpOFRGdd0L4Sx9ynV3O_9YJvO=2VBxvWYTfBHjabiDaUg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 03:24:06PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 09:13, Liu Xiang <liu.xiang@zlingsmart.com> wrote:
> >
> > After commit "40d09b53bfc557af7481b9d80f060a7ac9c7d314", request is
> > completed in softirq. This may cause the system to suffer bad preemptoff
> > time.
> > The mmc driver has its own complete workqueue, but it can not work
> > well now.
> > The REQ_HIPRI flag can be used to complete request directly in its own
> > complete workqueue and the preemptoff problem could be avoided.
> 
> I am trying to understand all of the problem, but I don't quite get
> it, sorry. Would it be possible for you to extend the description in
> the commit message a bit?

Yes, the message sounds weird.  The mentioned commit should obviously
not make any difference for drivers not using it.

> More exactly, what will happen if we tag a request with REQ_HIPRI
> before completing it? Apologize for my ignorance, but I am currently a
> bit overwhelmed with work, so I didn't have the time to really look it
> up myself.

Drivers must never set REQ_HIPRI!  This is a flag that is set by
the submitter, and actually cleared for most drivers that don't support
it by the block layer.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-05 22:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-21  8:13 Liu Xiang
2021-02-05 14:24 ` Ulf Hansson
2021-02-05 16:22   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-03-23 15:40 xiang fei
2021-03-23 19:11 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210205162221.GA27114@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liu.xiang@zlingsmart.com \
    --cc=liuxiang_1999@126.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome