From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>, <cohuck@redhat.com>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<pbonzini@redhat.com>, <peterx@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio/type1: Use follow_pte()
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 12:30:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210212123011.1ed7b062@omen.home.shazbot.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210212190851.GT4247@nvidia.com>
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:08:51 -0400
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:01:50PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > follow_pfn() doesn't make sure that we're using the correct page
> > protections, get the pte with follow_pte() so that we can test
> > protections and get the pfn from the pte.
> >
> > Fixes: 5cbf3264bc71 ("vfio/type1: Fix VA->PA translation for PFNMAP VMAs in vaddr_get_pfn()")
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > index ec9fd95a138b..90715413c3d9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > @@ -463,9 +463,11 @@ static int follow_fault_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mm_struct *mm,
> > unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long *pfn,
> > bool write_fault)
> > {
> > + pte_t *ptep;
> > + spinlock_t *ptl;
> > int ret;
> >
> > - ret = follow_pfn(vma, vaddr, pfn);
> > + ret = follow_pte(vma->vm_mm, vaddr, NULL, &ptep, NULL, &ptl);
> > if (ret) {
> > bool unlocked = false;
> >
> > @@ -479,9 +481,17 @@ static int follow_fault_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mm_struct *mm,
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - ret = follow_pfn(vma, vaddr, pfn);
> > + ret = follow_pte(vma->vm_mm, vaddr, NULL, &ptep, NULL, &ptl);
>
> commit 9fd6dad1261a541b3f5fa7dc5b152222306e6702 in linux-next is what
> export's follow_pte and it uses a different signature:
>
> +int follow_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
> + pte_t **ptepp, spinlock_t **ptlp)
Thanks, I stole it off the mailing list and hadn't noticed the change.
> Recommend you send this patch for rc1 once the right stuff lands in
> Linus's tree
>
> Otherwise it looks OK
>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Thanks!
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-12 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-12 19:01 Alex Williamson
2021-02-12 19:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-02-12 19:30 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2021-02-12 22:41 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-13 0:44 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-15 11:06 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210212123011.1ed7b062@omen.home.shazbot.org \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®