From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B944C433E0 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 15:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F043464E2B for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 15:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230389AbhBOPMz (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2021 10:12:55 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37374 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230306AbhBOPBo (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2021 10:01:44 -0500 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5095E64EA8; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:59:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 09:59:13 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Cc: , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add the latency-collector to tools Message-ID: <20210215095913.40bbfb99@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20210126142652.41b961f2@gandalf.local.home> <20210211161742.25386-1-Viktor.Rosendahl@bmw.de> <20210211145648.1e1e1325@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 11:54:08 +0000 wrote: > Just a quick update: I was able to reproduce this weird behavior that I wrote > about but it turned out to be a problem with my testing. > > The test was faulty because of a mistake that I had made. > > Sorry for the extra noise. No problem. Thanks for letting me know. -- Steve