From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FFEC433E0 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 22:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99CE964E57 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 22:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231786AbhBWW1O (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 17:27:14 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44056 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230330AbhBWW1A (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2021 17:27:00 -0500 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 923B364E3F; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 22:26:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 17:26:17 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: "chenjun (AM)" Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "gregory.herrero@oracle.com" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "Xiangrui (Euler)" Subject: Re: [PATCH] recordmcount: use w8 to read relp->r_info in arm64_is_fake_mcount Message-ID: <20210223172617.1aeb8e2d@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20210222135840.56250-1-chenjun102@huawei.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 15:50:19 +0000 "chenjun (AM)" wrote: > Hi > > There is no problem when I use aarch64_be(gcc v10.2). Because gcc v10.2 use __patchable_function_entries > instead of __mcount. I am not sure when the change happened. But you are still saying that this patch needs to be applied, right? -- Steve