From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] sched: Fix migration_cpu_stop() requeueing
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 13:24:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210224131355.357743989@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210224122439.176543586@infradead.org>
When affine_move_task(p) is called on a running task @p, which is not
otherwise already changing affinity, we'll first set
p->migration_pending and then do:
stop_one_cpu(cpu_of_rq(rq), migration_cpu_stop, &arg);
This then gets us to migration_cpu_stop() running on the CPU that was
previously running our victim task @p.
If we find that our task is no longer on that runqueue (this can
happen because of a concurrent migration due to load-balance etc.),
then we'll end up at the:
} else if (dest_cpu < 1 || pending) {
branch. Which we'll take because we set pending earlier. Here we first
check if the task @p has already satisfied the affinity constraints,
if so we bail early [A]. Otherwise we'll reissue migration_cpu_stop()
onto the CPU that is now hosting our task @p:
stop_one_cpu_nowait(cpu_of(rq), migration_cpu_stop,
&pending->arg, &pending->stop_work);
Except, we've never initialized pending->arg, which will be all 0s.
This then results in running migration_cpu_stop() on the next CPU with
arg->p == NULL, which gives the by now obvious result of fireworks.
The cure is to change affine_move_task() to always use pending->arg,
furthermore we can use the exact same pattern as the
SCA_MIGRATE_ENABLE case, since we'll block on the pending->done
completion anyway, no point in adding yet another completion in
stop_one_cpu().
This then gives a clear distinction between the two
migration_cpu_stop() use cases:
- sched_exec() / migrate_task_to() : arg->pending == NULL
- affine_move_task() : arg->pending != NULL;
And we can have it ignore p->migration_pending when !arg->pending. Any
stop work from sched_exec() / migrate_task_to() is in addition to stop
works from affine_move_task(), which will be sufficient to issue the
completion.
Fixes: 6d337eab041d ("sched: Fix migrate_disable() vs set_cpus_allowed_ptr()")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1922,6 +1922,24 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data
rq_lock(rq, &rf);
pending = p->migration_pending;
+ if (pending && !arg->pending) {
+ /*
+ * This happens from sched_exec() and migrate_task_to(),
+ * neither of them care about pending and just want a task to
+ * maybe move about.
+ *
+ * Even if there is a pending, we can ignore it, since
+ * affine_move_task() will have it's own stop_work's in flight
+ * which will manage the completion.
+ *
+ * Notably, pending doesn't need to match arg->pending. This can
+ * happen when tripple concurrent affine_move_task() first sets
+ * pending, then clears pending and eventually sets another
+ * pending.
+ */
+ pending = NULL;
+ }
+
/*
* If task_rq(p) != rq, it cannot be migrated here, because we're
* holding rq->lock, if p->on_rq == 0 it cannot get enqueued because
@@ -2194,10 +2212,6 @@ static int affine_move_task(struct rq *r
int dest_cpu, unsigned int flags)
{
struct set_affinity_pending my_pending = { }, *pending = NULL;
- struct migration_arg arg = {
- .task = p,
- .dest_cpu = dest_cpu,
- };
bool complete = false;
/* Can the task run on the task's current CPU? If so, we're done */
@@ -2235,6 +2249,12 @@ static int affine_move_task(struct rq *r
/* Install the request */
refcount_set(&my_pending.refs, 1);
init_completion(&my_pending.done);
+ my_pending.arg = (struct migration_arg) {
+ .task = p,
+ .dest_cpu = -1, /* any */
+ .pending = &my_pending,
+ };
+
p->migration_pending = &my_pending;
} else {
pending = p->migration_pending;
@@ -2265,12 +2285,6 @@ static int affine_move_task(struct rq *r
p->migration_flags &= ~MDF_PUSH;
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, rf);
- pending->arg = (struct migration_arg) {
- .task = p,
- .dest_cpu = -1,
- .pending = pending,
- };
-
stop_one_cpu_nowait(cpu_of(rq), migration_cpu_stop,
&pending->arg, &pending->stop_work);
@@ -2283,8 +2297,11 @@ static int affine_move_task(struct rq *r
* is_migration_disabled(p) checks to the stopper, which will
* run on the same CPU as said p.
*/
+ refcount_inc(&pending->refs); /* pending->{arg,stop_work} */
task_rq_unlock(rq, p, rf);
- stop_one_cpu(cpu_of(rq), migration_cpu_stop, &arg);
+
+ stop_one_cpu_nowait(cpu_of(rq), migration_cpu_stop,
+ &pending->arg, &pending->stop_work);
} else {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-24 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-24 12:24 [PATCH 0/6] sched: Fix affine_move_task() wreckage Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-24 12:24 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-03-01 10:16 ` [tip: sched/urgent] sched: Fix migration_cpu_stop() requeueing tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-06 11:42 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-24 12:24 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched: Simplify migration_cpu_stop() Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-24 15:34 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-02-25 8:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-25 11:10 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-03-01 10:16 ` [tip: sched/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-06 11:42 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-24 12:24 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched: Collate affine_move_task() stoppers Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-01 10:16 ` [tip: sched/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-06 11:42 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-24 12:24 ` [PATCH 4/6] sched: Optimize migration_cpu_stop() Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-01 10:16 ` [tip: sched/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-06 11:42 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-24 12:24 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched: Fix affine_move_task() self-concurrency Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-01 10:16 ` [tip: sched/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-06 11:42 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-24 12:24 ` [PATCH 6/6] sched: Simplify set_affinity_pending refcounts Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-24 15:34 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-02-24 15:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-24 17:59 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-02-25 9:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-25 11:11 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-03-01 10:16 ` [tip: sched/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-06 11:42 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210224131355.357743989@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®