From: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
To: ccaulfie@redhat.com, teigland@redhat.com,
cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rdunlap@infradead.org, Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2] fs: dlm: Spellings fixed throughout the file lock.c
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 06:32:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210228010205.28697-1-unixbhaskar@gmail.com> (raw)
Few spelling fixes throughout the file.
Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
---
Changes from V1:
Fixed the subject line typo.
Measured unwanted blank lines insertion.
fs/dlm/lock.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
index 002123efc6b0..b00001c36ed5 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static void del_timeout(struct dlm_lkb *lkb);
static void toss_rsb(struct kref *kref);
/*
- * Lock compatibilty matrix - thanks Steve
+ * Lock compatibility matrix - thanks Steve
* UN = Unlocked state. Not really a state, used as a flag
* PD = Padding. Used to make the matrix a nice power of two in size
* Other states are the same as the VMS DLM.
@@ -2357,14 +2357,14 @@ static int _can_be_granted(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int now,
* 6-5: But the default algorithm for deciding whether to grant or
* queue conversion requests does not by itself guarantee that such
* requests are serviced on a "first come first serve" basis. This, in
- * turn, can lead to a phenomenon known as "indefinate postponement".
+ * turn, can lead to a phenomenon known as "indefinite postponement".
*
* 6-7: This issue is dealt with by using the optional QUECVT flag with
* the system service employed to request a lock conversion. This flag
* forces certain conversion requests to be queued, even if they are
* compatible with the granted modes of other locks on the same
* resource. Thus, the use of this flag results in conversion requests
- * being ordered on a "first come first servce" basis.
+ * being ordered on a "first come first serve" basis.
*
* DCT: This condition is all about new conversions being able to occur
* "in place" while the lock remains on the granted queue (assuming
--
2.26.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-02-28 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-28 1:02 Bhaskar Chowdhury [this message]
2021-02-28 2:07 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210228010205.28697-1-unixbhaskar@gmail.com \
--to=unixbhaskar@gmail.com \
--cc=ccaulfie@redhat.com \
--cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=teigland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®