From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D65C433DB for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 07:22:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7944764DEE for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 07:22:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232455AbhCAHWQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2021 02:22:16 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:52575 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232441AbhCAHWM (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2021 02:22:12 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 2651568BEB; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 08:21:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 08:21:28 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Tomasz Figa , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Marek Szyprowski , Ricardo Ribalda , Sergey Senozhatsky , "open list:IOMMU DRIVERS" , Robin Murphy , Linux Doc Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] dma-iommu: implement ->alloc_noncontiguous Message-ID: <20210301072128.GA27039@lst.de> References: <20210202095110.1215346-1-hch@lst.de> <20210202095110.1215346-7-hch@lst.de> <20210216084947.GA23897@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 04:17:42PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > > Do you think we could add the attrs parameter to the > > > dma_alloc_noncontiguous() API? > > > > Yes, we could probably do that. > > I can cook a patch, unless somebody is already looking into it. I plan to resend the whole series with the comments very soon.