mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] x86/kprobes: Use int3 instead of debug trap for single-step
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 21:51:24 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210302215124.2614a36fdf084d514dabfc4d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YD39U0sz+IjV60VE@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 09:54:43 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 09:41:32AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > Aside of a few nits:
> 
> something like so..

Thanks Peter,
I completely agree with that change!
Let me update the patch.


> 
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> @@ -457,13 +457,20 @@ static void kprobe_emulate_call(struct k
>  }
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_emulate_call);
>  
> -static void kprobe_emulate_jmp(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +static __always_inline 
> +void __kprobe_emulate_jmp(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs, bool cond)
>  {
>  	unsigned long ip = regs->ip - INT3_INSN_SIZE + p->ainsn.size;
>  
> -	ip += p->ainsn.rel32;
> +	if (cond)
> +		ip += p->ainsn.rel32;
>  	int3_emulate_jmp(regs, ip);
>  }
> +
> +static void kprobe_emulate_jmp(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	__kprobe_emulate_jmp(p, regs, true);
> +}
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_emulate_jmp);
>  
>  static const unsigned long jcc_mask[6] = {
> @@ -488,10 +495,7 @@ static void kprobe_emulate_jcc(struct kp
>  		if (p->ainsn.jcc.type >= 0xe)
>  			match = match && (regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_ZF);
>  	}
> -	if ((match && !invert) || (!match && invert))
> -		kprobe_emulate_jmp(p, regs);
> -	else
> -		regs->ip = regs->ip - INT3_INSN_SIZE + p->ainsn.size;
> +	__kprobe_emulate_jmp(p, regs, (match && !invert) || (!match && invert));
>  }
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_emulate_jcc);
>  
> @@ -524,10 +528,7 @@ static void kprobe_emulate_loop(struct k
>  	else if (p->ainsn.loop.type == 1)	/* LOOPE */
>  		match = match && (regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_ZF);
>  
> -	if (match)
> -		kprobe_emulate_jmp(p, regs);
> -	else
> -		regs->ip = regs->ip - INT3_INSN_SIZE + p->ainsn.size;
> +	__kprobe_emulate_jmp(p, regs, match);
>  }
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_emulate_loop);
>  
> @@ -613,6 +614,12 @@ static int prepare_emulation(struct kpro
>  		else
>  			p->ainsn.rel32 = *(s32 *)&insn->immediate.value;
>  		break;
> +	case 0x70 ... 0x7f:
> +		/* 1 byte conditional jump */
> +		p->ainsn.emulate_op = kprobe_emulate_jcc;
> +		p->ainsn.jcc.type = opcode & 0xf;
> +		p->ainsn.rel32 = *(char *)insn->immediate.bytes;
> +		break;
>  	case 0x0f:
>  		opcode = insn->opcode.bytes[1];
>  		if ((opcode & 0xf0) == 0x80) {
> @@ -667,12 +674,7 @@ static int prepare_emulation(struct kpro
>  #endif
>  		break;
>  	default:
> -		if ((opcode & 0xf0) == 0x70) {
> -			/* 1 byte conditional jump */
> -			p->ainsn.emulate_op = kprobe_emulate_jcc;
> -			p->ainsn.jcc.type = opcode & 0xf;
> -			p->ainsn.rel32 = *(char *)insn->immediate.bytes;
> -		}
> +		break;
>  	}
>  	p->ainsn.size = insn->length;
>  


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-02 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-23 23:24 Why do kprobes and uprobes singlestep? Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-24  1:17 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-02-24 19:45   ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-25  2:22     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-02-25  6:03       ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-25  9:11         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-01 14:08       ` [RFC PATCH 0/1] x86/kprobes: Remoev single-step trap from x86 kprobes Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-01 14:08         ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] x86/kprobes: Use int3 instead of debug trap for single-step Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-02  8:06           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-02  8:38           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-02  8:41           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-02  8:54             ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-02 12:51               ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2021-03-02 13:58               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-02 15:25       ` [PATCH -tip 0/3] x86/kprobes: Remoev single-step trap from x86 kprobes Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-02 15:25         ` [PATCH -tip 1/3] x86/kprobes: Retrieve correct opcode for group instruction Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-23 15:15           ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-02 15:25         ` [PATCH -tip 2/3] x86/kprobes: Identify far indirect JMP correctly Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-23 15:15           ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-02 15:25         ` [PATCH -tip 3/3] x86/kprobes: Use int3 instead of debug trap for single-step Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-23 15:15           ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-17 14:55         ` [PATCH -tip 0/3] x86/kprobes: Remoev single-step trap from x86 kprobes Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-17 16:26           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-17 17:45             ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-25  9:59     ` Why do kprobes and uprobes singlestep? Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-01 16:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-03-02  1:36   ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-02 20:24     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-03-02 21:02       ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-03  1:22         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-03-03  1:46           ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-03  2:18             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-03-03 13:27               ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-03-03 18:11               ` Daniel Xu
2021-03-03 19:14                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-02 20:25     ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-03-02 20:35       ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-02 20:28     ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-03-02  2:22   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-02  2:48     ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-03-02 20:31     ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210302215124.2614a36fdf084d514dabfc4d@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome