From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, rafael@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
lukasz.luba@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] powercap/drivers/dtpm: Scale the power with the load
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 23:42:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210309224244.27225-5-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210309224244.27225-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Currently the power consumption is based on the current OPP power
assuming the entire performance domain is fully loaded.
That gives very gross power estimation and we can do much better by
using the load to scale the power consumption.
Use the utilization to normalize and scale the power usage over the
max possible power.
Tested on a rock960 with 2 big CPUS, the power consumption estimation
conforms with the expected one.
Before this change:
~$ ~/dhrystone -t 1 -l 10000&
~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw
2260000
After this change:
~$ ~/dhrystone -t 1 -l 10000&
~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw
1130000
~$ ~/dhrystone -t 2 -l 10000&
~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw
2260000
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
---
V2:
- Replaced cpumask by em_span_cpus
- Changed 'util' metrics variable types
- Optimized utilization scaling power computation
- Renamed parameter name for scale_pd_power_uw()
---
drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c b/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
index ac7f2e7e262f..6a1537e6da0d 100644
--- a/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
+++ b/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c
@@ -68,27 +68,40 @@ static u64 set_pd_power_limit(struct dtpm *dtpm, u64 power_limit)
return power_limit;
}
+static u64 scale_pd_power_uw(struct cpumask *pd_mask, u64 power)
+{
+ unsigned long max, sum_util = 0;
+ int cpu;
+
+ max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
+
+ for_each_cpu_and(cpu, pd_mask, cpu_online_mask)
+ sum_util += sched_cpu_util(cpu, max);
+
+ return (power * ((sum_util << 10) / max)) >> 10;
+}
+
static u64 get_pd_power_uw(struct dtpm *dtpm)
{
struct dtpm_cpu *dtpm_cpu = to_dtpm_cpu(dtpm);
struct em_perf_domain *pd;
- struct cpumask cpus;
+ struct cpumask *pd_mask;
unsigned long freq;
- int i, nr_cpus;
+ int i;
pd = em_cpu_get(dtpm_cpu->cpu);
- freq = cpufreq_quick_get(dtpm_cpu->cpu);
- cpumask_and(&cpus, cpu_online_mask, to_cpumask(pd->cpus));
- nr_cpus = cpumask_weight(&cpus);
+ pd_mask = em_span_cpus(pd);
+
+ freq = cpufreq_quick_get(dtpm_cpu->cpu);
for (i = 0; i < pd->nr_perf_states; i++) {
if (pd->table[i].frequency < freq)
continue;
- return pd->table[i].power *
- MICROWATT_PER_MILLIWATT * nr_cpus;
+ return scale_pd_power_uw(pd_mask, pd->table[i].power *
+ MICROWATT_PER_MILLIWATT);
}
return 0;
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-09 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-09 22:42 [PATCH v2 1/5] powercap/drivers/dtpm: Encapsulate even more the code Daniel Lezcano
2021-03-09 22:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] powercap/drivers/dtpm: Create a registering system Daniel Lezcano
2021-03-09 22:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] powercap/drivers/dtpm: Simplify the dtpm table Daniel Lezcano
2021-03-09 22:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] powercap/drivers/dtpm: Use container_of instead of a private data field Daniel Lezcano
2021-03-09 22:42 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2021-03-10 0:40 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] powercap/drivers/dtpm: Scale the power with the load kernel test robot
2021-03-10 4:39 ` kernel test robot
2021-03-10 4:58 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210309224244.27225-5-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome