Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: schedutil: Call sugov_update_next_freq() before check to fast_switch_enabled

[Yue Hu <zbestahu@gmail.com>]

Hi Rafael,

Please also review the patch.
I'm not sure if you have reviewed or not.

Thank you!

On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 12:17:27 +0530
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 24-02-21, 14:39, Yue Hu wrote:
> > From: Yue Hu <huyue2@yulong.com>
> > 
> > Note that sugov_update_next_freq() may return false, that means the
> > caller sugov_fast_switch() will do nothing except fast switch check.
> > 
> > Similarly, sugov_deferred_update() also has unnecessary operations
> > of raw_spin_{lock,unlock} in sugov_update_single_freq() for that case.
> > 
> > So, let's call sugov_update_next_freq() before the fast switch check
> > to avoid unnecessary behaviors above. Accordingly, update interface
> > definition to sugov_deferred_update() and remove sugov_fast_switch()
> > since we will call cpufreq_driver_fast_switch() directly instead.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@yulong.com>
> > ---
> > v2: remove sugov_fast_switch() and call cpufreq_driver_fast_switch()
> >     directly instead, also update minor log message.
> > 
> >  kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 29 ++++++++++++-----------------
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)  
> 
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>