From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B94C4332B for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 18:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0A864F3B for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 18:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232714AbhCRSmo (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:42:44 -0400 Received: from mail-40131.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.131]:64866 "EHLO mail-40131.protonmail.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232624AbhCRSmf (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:42:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 18:42:30 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pm.me; s=protonmail; t=1616092953; bh=CZPzXPr6kxKmjKYiFth7lEmlditzWiKAt31a6bYz0BI=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FIaVLXSW92dxr8oytIZCizii/i9XUVemC0T7TIRFjAl8uwZpExxjQ7C3+J5qZMr4W wwTyCbbGbZndoyKBBvrGYBmryILMnlvz6RobHBpFBkBBdlQ1i1TT2nqw1WeCuAmYTB yDraprzPaWRcHKCv4BKVytT64iZCjXFeB0+XMqZ0rcFlVbUjB57tUVJR5QOtqCAwLe 8aayIKPCRWVZuQYFOvvVtuYaiA2kx+5bjFKjKFbrFMj9tR4Om6jX8PT0e8zpnuE4tC 5gpLrw10tKVeR7UODv2P8EOCVlvB5NLFkaXNCHs5srn/NlZ1MGgsv1ROlw4lXYt79u EP2wMyhm3hm4Q== To: "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski From: Alexander Lobakin Cc: Alexander Lobakin , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Kirill Tkhai , Bartosz Golaszewski , Leon Romanovsky , Eric Dumazet , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: Alexander Lobakin Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/4] gro: add combined call_gro_receive() + INDIRECT_CALL_INET() helper Message-ID: <20210318184157.700604-3-alobakin@pm.me> In-Reply-To: <20210318184157.700604-1-alobakin@pm.me> References: <20210318184157.700604-1-alobakin@pm.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org call_gro_receive() is used to limit GRO recursion, but it works only with callback pointers. There's a combined version of call_gro_receive() + INDIRECT_CALL_2() in , but it doesn't check for IPv6 modularity. Add a similar new helper to cover both of these. It can and will be used to avoid retpoline overhead when IP header lies behind another offloaded proto. Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin --- include/net/gro.h | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/net/gro.h b/include/net/gro.h index 27c38b36df16..01edaf3fdda0 100644 --- a/include/net/gro.h +++ b/include/net/gro.h @@ -14,4 +14,12 @@ INDIRECT_CALLABLE_DECLARE(int ipv6_gro_complete(struct s= k_buff *, int)); INDIRECT_CALLABLE_DECLARE(struct sk_buff *inet_gro_receive(struct list_hea= d *, =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 struct sk_buff *)); INDIRECT_CALLABLE_DECLARE(int inet_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *, int)); + +#define indirect_call_gro_receive_inet(cb, f2, f1, head, skb)=09\ +({=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09\ +=09unlikely(gro_recursion_inc_test(skb)) ?=09=09=09\ +=09=09NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->flush |=3D 1, NULL :=09=09\ +=09=09INDIRECT_CALL_INET(cb, f2, f1, head, skb);=09\ +}) + #endif /* _NET_IPV6_GRO_H */ -- 2.31.0