From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79999C433C1 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:00:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5334361919 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:00:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230285AbhCSO7c (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:59:32 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33462 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230373AbhCSO7b (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:59:31 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07CFDC06174A; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 07:59:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f091e0035ab8ae551405c9b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f09:1e00:35ab:8ae5:5140:5c9b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 2342A1EC027A; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:59:28 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1616165968; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=xDfmZontdcXI2rx+Td4htHoNtz/t5xTpmRVJBIIMsHg=; b=Ma5is/I+4bJeGbuzEqFO6gViaiB8cbRlxmS73VpXp6fyZ0rAjYZDbaCbSeRJgLVW0/jhoZ ZS7cx/j73uuwbqWlnpJRrUwxZ2ToY0hxmKYGXQgy75Lv/AHGwwBeGTJDzJE+mwaHS46Wx8 tu7Tnv6p5K4nXZZbz3OyqLfc4XSP184= Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:59:31 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: Kai Huang , x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: Avoid returning NULL in __sgx_alloc_epc_page() Message-ID: <20210319145931.GH6251@zn.tnic> References: <20210319040602.178558-1-kai.huang@intel.com> <20210319084523.GA6251@zn.tnic> <20210319220141.8bf20c54fdb06c6f93cde448@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:50:33PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > I was on the verge whether to merge that into the original patch since > > > it is the top patch on the branch or create a new one but opted for > > > former because this way it won't break bisection and people won't have > > > to pay attention whether there's a fix patch to the NUMA patch too, in > > > case they wanna backport and whatnot. ... > I understood Boris' comment that the fixes would not be squashed. Please read it again and let me know what about it is not clear. It is at the beginning of this mail. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette