From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] psi: reduce calls to sched_clock() in psi
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 13:51:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210321205156.4186483-1-shakeelb@google.com> (raw)
We noticed that the cost of psi increases with the increase in the
levels of the cgroups. Particularly the cost of cpu_clock() sticks out
as the kernel calls it multiple times as it traverses up the cgroup
tree. This patch reduces the calls to cpu_clock().
Performed perf bench on Intel Broadwell with 3 levels of cgroup.
Before the patch:
$ perf bench sched all
# Running sched/messaging benchmark...
# 20 sender and receiver processes per group
# 10 groups == 400 processes run
Total time: 0.747 [sec]
# Running sched/pipe benchmark...
# Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes
Total time: 3.516 [sec]
3.516689 usecs/op
284358 ops/sec
After the patch:
$ perf bench sched all
# Running sched/messaging benchmark...
# 20 sender and receiver processes per group
# 10 groups == 400 processes run
Total time: 0.640 [sec]
# Running sched/pipe benchmark...
# Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes
Total time: 3.329 [sec]
3.329820 usecs/op
300316 ops/sec
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
---
kernel/sched/psi.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/psi.c b/kernel/sched/psi.c
index ee3c5b48622f..16348b269713 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/psi.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/psi.c
@@ -644,12 +644,10 @@ static void poll_timer_fn(struct timer_list *t)
wake_up_interruptible(&group->poll_wait);
}
-static void record_times(struct psi_group_cpu *groupc, int cpu)
+static void record_times(struct psi_group_cpu *groupc, u64 now)
{
u32 delta;
- u64 now;
- now = cpu_clock(cpu);
delta = now - groupc->state_start;
groupc->state_start = now;
@@ -676,7 +674,7 @@ static void record_times(struct psi_group_cpu *groupc, int cpu)
}
static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu,
- unsigned int clear, unsigned int set,
+ unsigned int clear, unsigned int set, u64 now,
bool wake_clock)
{
struct psi_group_cpu *groupc;
@@ -696,7 +694,7 @@ static void psi_group_change(struct psi_group *group, int cpu,
*/
write_seqcount_begin(&groupc->seq);
- record_times(groupc, cpu);
+ record_times(groupc, now);
for (t = 0, m = clear; m; m &= ~(1 << t), t++) {
if (!(m & (1 << t)))
@@ -788,12 +786,14 @@ void psi_task_change(struct task_struct *task, int clear, int set)
struct psi_group *group;
bool wake_clock = true;
void *iter = NULL;
+ u64 now;
if (!task->pid)
return;
psi_flags_change(task, clear, set);
+ now = cpu_clock(cpu);
/*
* Periodic aggregation shuts off if there is a period of no
* task changes, so we wake it back up if necessary. However,
@@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ void psi_task_change(struct task_struct *task, int clear, int set)
wake_clock = false;
while ((group = iterate_groups(task, &iter)))
- psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, wake_clock);
+ psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, now, wake_clock);
}
void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
@@ -815,6 +815,7 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
struct psi_group *group, *common = NULL;
int cpu = task_cpu(prev);
void *iter;
+ u64 now = cpu_clock(cpu);
if (next->pid) {
bool identical_state;
@@ -836,7 +837,7 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
break;
}
- psi_group_change(group, cpu, 0, TSK_ONCPU, true);
+ psi_group_change(group, cpu, 0, TSK_ONCPU, now, true);
}
}
@@ -858,7 +859,7 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
iter = NULL;
while ((group = iterate_groups(prev, &iter)) && group != common)
- psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, true);
+ psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, now, true);
/*
* TSK_ONCPU is handled up to the common ancestor. If we're tasked
@@ -867,7 +868,7 @@ void psi_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next,
if (sleep) {
clear &= ~TSK_ONCPU;
for (; group; group = iterate_groups(prev, &iter))
- psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, true);
+ psi_group_change(group, cpu, clear, set, now, true);
}
}
}
--
2.31.0.291.g576ba9dcdaf-goog
next reply other threads:[~2021-03-21 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-21 20:51 Shakeel Butt [this message]
2021-03-22 7:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-22 14:19 ` Johannes Weiner
2021-03-23 15:08 ` [tip: sched/core] psi: Reduce " tip-bot2 for Shakeel Butt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210321205156.4186483-1-shakeelb@google.com \
--to=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®