mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org
Cc: rdunlap@infradead.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
	evgreen@chromium.org, cpratapa@codeaurora.org,
	subashab@codeaurora.org, elder@kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: ipa: avoid 64-bit modulus
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 20:05:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210323010505.2149882-1-elder@linaro.org> (raw)

It is possible for a 32 bit x86 build to use a 64 bit DMA address.

There are two remaining spots where the IPA driver does a modulo
operation to check alignment of a DMA address, and under certain
conditions this can lead to a build error on i386 (at least).

The alignment checks we're doing are for power-of-2 values, and this
means the lower 32 bits of the DMA address can be used.  This ensures
both operands to the modulo operator are 32 bits wide.

Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/net/ipa/gsi.c       | 11 +++++++----
 drivers/net/ipa/ipa_table.c |  9 ++++++---
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ipa/gsi.c b/drivers/net/ipa/gsi.c
index 7f3e338ca7a72..b6355827bf900 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ipa/gsi.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ipa/gsi.c
@@ -1436,15 +1436,18 @@ static void gsi_evt_ring_rx_update(struct gsi_evt_ring *evt_ring, u32 index)
 /* Initialize a ring, including allocating DMA memory for its entries */
 static int gsi_ring_alloc(struct gsi *gsi, struct gsi_ring *ring, u32 count)
 {
-	size_t size = count * GSI_RING_ELEMENT_SIZE;
+	u32 size = count * GSI_RING_ELEMENT_SIZE;
 	struct device *dev = gsi->dev;
 	dma_addr_t addr;
 
-	/* Hardware requires a 2^n ring size, with alignment equal to size */
+	/* Hardware requires a 2^n ring size, with alignment equal to size.
+	 * The size is a power of 2, so we can check alignment using just
+	 * the bottom 32 bits for a DMA address of any size.
+	 */
 	ring->virt = dma_alloc_coherent(dev, size, &addr, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (ring->virt && addr % size) {
+	if (ring->virt && lower_32_bits(addr) % size) {
 		dma_free_coherent(dev, size, ring->virt, addr);
-		dev_err(dev, "unable to alloc 0x%zx-aligned ring buffer\n",
+		dev_err(dev, "unable to alloc 0x%x-aligned ring buffer\n",
 			size);
 		return -EINVAL;	/* Not a good error value, but distinct */
 	} else if (!ring->virt) {
diff --git a/drivers/net/ipa/ipa_table.c b/drivers/net/ipa/ipa_table.c
index 988f2c2886b95..4236a50ff03ae 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ipa/ipa_table.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ipa/ipa_table.c
@@ -658,10 +658,13 @@ int ipa_table_init(struct ipa *ipa)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	/* We put the "zero rule" at the base of our table area.  The IPA
-	 * hardware requires rules to be aligned on a 128-byte boundary.
-	 * Make sure the allocation satisfies this constraint.
+	 * hardware requires route and filter table rules to be aligned
+	 * on a 128-byte boundary.  As long as the alignment constraint
+	 * is a power of 2, we can check alignment using just the bottom
+	 * 32 bits for a DMA address of any size.
 	 */
-	if (addr % IPA_TABLE_ALIGN) {
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(!is_power_of_2(IPA_TABLE_ALIGN));
+	if (lower_32_bits(addr) % IPA_TABLE_ALIGN) {
 		dev_err(dev, "table address %pad not %u-byte aligned\n",
 			&addr, IPA_TABLE_ALIGN);
 		dma_free_coherent(dev, size, virt, addr);
-- 
2.27.0


             reply	other threads:[~2021-03-23  1:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-23  1:05 Alex Elder [this message]
2021-03-23  2:44 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-03-24  0:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2021-03-24 16:27 ` David Laight
2021-03-24 17:07   ` Alex Elder
2021-03-24 17:12     ` David Laight
2021-03-24 17:32       ` Alex Elder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210323010505.2149882-1-elder@linaro.org \
    --to=elder@linaro.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=cpratapa@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=elder@kernel.org \
    --cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=subashab@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome