From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: processor: Fix CPU0 wakeup in acpi_idle_play_dead()
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:22:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210324152219.1456012-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> (raw)
Commit 496121c02127 ("ACPI: processor: idle: Allow probing on platforms
with one ACPI C-state") broke CPU0 hotplug on certain systems, e.g.
I'm observing the following on AWS Nitro (e.g r5b.xlarge but other
instance types are affected as well):
# echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/online
# echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/online
<10 seconds delay>
-bash: echo: write error: Input/output error
In fact, the above mentioned commit only revealed the problem and did
not introduce it. On x86, to wakeup CPU an NMI is being used and
hlt_play_dead()/mwait_play_dead() loops are prepared to handle it:
/*
* If NMI wants to wake up CPU0, start CPU0.
*/
if (wakeup_cpu0())
start_cpu0();
cpuidle_play_dead() -> acpi_idle_play_dead() (which is now being called on
systems where it wasn't called before the above mentioned commit) serves
the same purpose but it doesn't have a path for CPU0. What happens now on
wakeup is:
- NMI is sent to CPU0
- wakeup_cpu0_nmi() works as expected
- we get back to while (1) loop in acpi_idle_play_dead()
- safe_halt() puts CPU0 to sleep again.
The straightforward/minimal fix is add the special handling for CPU0 on x86
and that's what the patch is doing.
Fixes: 496121c02127 ("ACPI: processor: idle: Allow probing on platforms with one ACPI C-state")
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 +-
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 7 +++++++
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
index c0538f82c9a2..57ef2094af93 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
@@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ void native_play_dead(void);
void play_dead_common(void);
void wbinvd_on_cpu(int cpu);
int wbinvd_on_all_cpus(void);
+bool wakeup_cpu0(void);
void native_smp_send_reschedule(int cpu);
void native_send_call_func_ipi(const struct cpumask *mask);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 02813a7f3a7c..f877150a91da 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -1659,7 +1659,7 @@ void play_dead_common(void)
local_irq_disable();
}
-static bool wakeup_cpu0(void)
+bool wakeup_cpu0(void)
{
if (smp_processor_id() == 0 && enable_start_cpu0)
return true;
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
index d93e400940a3..eb1101b16c08 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_X86
#include <asm/apic.h>
+#include <asm/cpu.h>
#endif
#define _COMPONENT ACPI_PROCESSOR_COMPONENT
@@ -541,6 +542,12 @@ static int acpi_idle_play_dead(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
wait_for_freeze();
} else
return -ENODEV;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86
+ /* If NMI wants to wake up CPU0, start CPU0. */
+ if (wakeup_cpu0())
+ start_cpu0();
+#endif
}
/* Never reached */
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-03-24 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-24 15:22 Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2021-03-24 15:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-29 17:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210324152219.1456012-1-vkuznets@redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=ahs3@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®