From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86/kprobes: Use int3 instead of debug trap for single-step
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 07:58:14 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210325075814.a66606773b47482b56e9d596@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37cd1689-d192-dd89-af7c-eaf074b5f911@canonical.com>
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:48:34 +0000
Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Static analysis on linux-next using Coverity has detected an issue in
> the following commit:
>
> commit 6256e668b7af9d81472e03c6a171630c08f8858a
> Author: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Date: Wed Mar 3 00:25:46 2021 +0900
>
> x86/kprobes: Use int3 instead of debug trap for single-step
>
> The analysis is as follows:
>
> 160 switch (opcode & 0xf0) {
> 161 case 0x60:
> 162 /* can't boost "bound" */
> 163 return (opcode != 0x62);
> 164 case 0x70:
> 165 return 0; /* can't boost conditional jump */
> 166 case 0x90:
> 167 return opcode != 0x9a; /* can't boost call far */
> 168 case 0xc0:
> 169 /* can't boost software-interruptions */
> 170 return (0xc1 < opcode && opcode < 0xcc) || opcode ==
> 0xcf;
> 171 case 0xd0:
> 172 /* can boost AA* and XLAT */
> 173 return (opcode == 0xd4 || opcode == 0xd5 || opcode ==
> 0xd7);
> 174 case 0xe0:
> 175 /* can boost in/out and absolute jmps */
> 176 return ((opcode & 0x04) || opcode == 0xea);
> 177 case 0xf0:
> 178 /* clear and set flags are boostable */
> 179 return (opcode == 0xf5 || (0xf7 < opcode && opcode <
> 0xfe));
>
> dead_error_condition: The switch governing value opcode & 0xf0 cannot
> be 255.
> undefined (#1 of 1): Logically dead code (DEADCODE)
> dead_error_begin: Execution cannot reach this statement: case 255:
>
> 180 case 0xff:
> 181 /* indirect jmp is boostable */
> 182 return X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.bytes[0]) == 4;
>
> the case 0xff statement can never be reached because the switch
> statement is acting on opcode & 0xf0.
Good catch! It must be under the case 0xf0...
Thank you!
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-24 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-24 15:48 Colin Ian King
2021-03-24 22:58 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210325075814.a66606773b47482b56e9d596@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®