From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606C1C433E1 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 08:23:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B7661A28 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 08:23:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229519AbhCYIWh (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 04:22:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55906 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229716AbhCYIWP (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 04:22:15 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C4BAC06174A; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 01:22:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-ID:Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References; bh=mwM2SreNjinm5R/W2w3CxcJnRoqyfJkSmd4Ey8StaXk=; b=VkeBsqdl/8z1J9XCE2L0+qH8S1 z3JWZgRMp6dp0GZmrqYdEUxwx2kWvmaYOdOc7PSrAbCxCSm8ecYtdwbCHGu97hjrndpN16VPphURD mb1WeBMHm9L/sWOZ7f98QBicDSj4i6zG7s4lXBCresk+A1w/wpN4mQH54YPjwSAQ0WE5J+O5XhnZZ AwtNHHow6UWwrz6EthuceC6t0kop2Wce32J+Vq7Wc8Xws9Lcg0E8HQW9E/dxZADeS3eQdIvqIFqQv 9P0eKzeEm/XoXCJY3eHkxpNEBlqDCiYlRM+lB88NrUqjjXg5qsrYnVuWzu4blBxfkFNWrX0bJhIrp OFCDh8AQ==; Received: from [2001:4bb8:191:f692:9658:56e2:eade:cbfa] (helo=localhost) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lPLFs-004X63-3w; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 08:22:12 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Al Viro Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook , Andy Lutomirski , Will Drewry Subject: split receive_fd_replace from __receive_fd Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:22:08 +0100 Message-Id: <20210325082209.1067987-1-hch@lst.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The receive_fd_replace case shares almost no logic with the more general __receive_fd case, so split it into a separate function. BTW, I'm not sure if receive_fd_replace is such a useful primitive to start with, why not just open code it in seccomp?