mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] srcu: Fix broken node geometry after early ssp init
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 15:12:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210402221232.GU2696@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210402205038.GB134532@lothringen>

On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 10:50:38PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 08:03:57AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 12:02:21PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > Arguably that's a quite a corner case and I don't expect anyone to call
> > > start_poll_synchronize_srcu() so early but who knows. An alternative is to
> > > forbid it and warn if used before srcu is initialized.
> > 
> > Another approach would be to have start_poll_synchronize_rcu() check to
> > see if initialization has happened, and if not, simply queue a callback.
> > 
> > Any other ways to make this work?
> 
> Ok I think that should work. We want to make sure that the cookies returned
> by each call to start_poll_synchronize_rcu() before rcu_init_geometry() will
> match the gpnums targeted by the corresponding callbacks we requeue.
> 
> Since we are very early and the workqueues can't schedule, the grace periods
> shouldn't be able to complete. Assuming ssp->srcu_gp_seq is initialized as N.
> The first call to call_srcu/start_poll_synchronize_rcu should target gpnum N +
> 1. Then all those that follow should target gpnum N + 2 and not further.
> 
> While we call srcu_init() and requeue the callbacks in order after resetting
> gpnum to N, this should just behave the same and attribute the right gpnum
> to each callbacks.
> 
> It would have been a problem if the workqueues could schedule and complete
> grace periods concurrently because we might target gpnum N + 3, N + 4, ...
> as we requeue the callbacks. But it's not the case so we should be fine as
> long as callbacks are requeued in order.
> 
> Does that sound right to you as well? If so I can try it.

Makes sense to me!

There also needs to be an additional start_poll_synchronize_rcu() check
to avoid double call_rcu() of a single rcu_head structure.  But everything
is single-threaded at that point, and this check is after the check
for already being initialized, so this should be no problem.

And yes, srcu_init() happens well before context switch is possible,
let alone workqueues scheduling.  Famous last words...

							Thanx, Paul

      reply	other threads:[~2021-04-02 22:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-01 23:47 [PATCH 0/3] srcu: Fix boot stall Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-01 23:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] srcu: Remove superfluous ssp initialization on deferred work queue Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-02  0:48   ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-02  0:58     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-02  1:19       ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-02  1:01     ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-01 23:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] srcu: Remove superfluous sdp->srcu_lock_count zero filling Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-02  0:58   ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-01 23:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] srcu: Fix broken node geometry after early ssp init Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-02  1:12   ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-02 10:02     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-02 15:03       ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-02 20:50         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-02 22:12           ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210402221232.GU2696@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72 \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®