mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gcov: re-drop support for clang-10
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 12:07:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210407190749.p3h72h4zlshiyt76@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210407185456.41943-3-ndesaulniers@google.com>


On 2021-04-07, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>LLVM changed the expected function signatures for
>llvm_gcda_emit_function() in the clang-11 release.  Drop the older
>implementations and require folks to upgrade their compiler if they're
>interested in GCOV support.
>
>Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
>---
> kernel/gcov/clang.c | 40 ----------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 40 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/kernel/gcov/clang.c b/kernel/gcov/clang.c
>index 1747204541bf..78c4dc751080 100644
>--- a/kernel/gcov/clang.c
>+++ b/kernel/gcov/clang.c
>@@ -69,9 +69,6 @@ struct gcov_fn_info {
>
> 	u32 ident;
> 	u32 checksum;
>-#if CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION < 110000
>-	u8 use_extra_checksum;
>-#endif
> 	u32 cfg_checksum;
>
> 	u32 num_counters;
>@@ -113,23 +110,6 @@ void llvm_gcda_start_file(const char *orig_filename, u32 version, u32 checksum)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(llvm_gcda_start_file);
>
>-#if CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION < 110000
>-void llvm_gcda_emit_function(u32 ident, u32 func_checksum,
>-		u8 use_extra_checksum, u32 cfg_checksum)
>-{
>-	struct gcov_fn_info *info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
>-
>-	if (!info)
>-		return;
>-
>-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&info->head);
>-	info->ident = ident;
>-	info->checksum = func_checksum;
>-	info->use_extra_checksum = use_extra_checksum;
>-	info->cfg_checksum = cfg_checksum;
>-	list_add_tail(&info->head, &current_info->functions);
>-}
>-#else
> void llvm_gcda_emit_function(u32 ident, u32 func_checksum, u32 cfg_checksum)
> {
> 	struct gcov_fn_info *info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
>@@ -143,7 +123,6 @@ void llvm_gcda_emit_function(u32 ident, u32 func_checksum, u32 cfg_checksum)
> 	info->cfg_checksum = cfg_checksum;
> 	list_add_tail(&info->head, &current_info->functions);
> }
>-#endif
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(llvm_gcda_emit_function);
>
> void llvm_gcda_emit_arcs(u32 num_counters, u64 *counters)
>@@ -274,16 +253,8 @@ int gcov_info_is_compatible(struct gcov_info *info1, struct gcov_info *info2)
> 		!list_is_last(&fn_ptr2->head, &info2->functions)) {
> 		if (fn_ptr1->checksum != fn_ptr2->checksum)
> 			return false;
>-#if CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION < 110000
>-		if (fn_ptr1->use_extra_checksum != fn_ptr2->use_extra_checksum)
>-			return false;
>-		if (fn_ptr1->use_extra_checksum &&
>-			fn_ptr1->cfg_checksum != fn_ptr2->cfg_checksum)
>-			return false;
>-#else
> 		if (fn_ptr1->cfg_checksum != fn_ptr2->cfg_checksum)
> 			return false;
>-#endif
> 		fn_ptr1 = list_next_entry(fn_ptr1, head);
> 		fn_ptr2 = list_next_entry(fn_ptr2, head);
> 	}
>@@ -403,21 +374,10 @@ size_t convert_to_gcda(char *buffer, struct gcov_info *info)
> 		u32 i;
>
> 		pos += store_gcov_u32(buffer, pos, GCOV_TAG_FUNCTION);
>-#if CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION < 110000
>-		pos += store_gcov_u32(buffer, pos,
>-			fi_ptr->use_extra_checksum ? 3 : 2);
>-#else
> 		pos += store_gcov_u32(buffer, pos, 3);
>-#endif
> 		pos += store_gcov_u32(buffer, pos, fi_ptr->ident);
> 		pos += store_gcov_u32(buffer, pos, fi_ptr->checksum);
>-#if CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION < 110000
>-		if (fi_ptr->use_extra_checksum)
>-			pos += store_gcov_u32(buffer, pos, fi_ptr->cfg_checksum);
>-#else
> 		pos += store_gcov_u32(buffer, pos, fi_ptr->cfg_checksum);
>-#endif
>-
> 		pos += store_gcov_u32(buffer, pos, GCOV_TAG_COUNTER_BASE);
> 		pos += store_gcov_u32(buffer, pos, fi_ptr->num_counters * 2);
> 		for (i = 0; i < fi_ptr->num_counters; i++)
>-- 
>2.31.1.295.g9ea45b61b8-goog
>

Looks good for both. Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-07 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-07 18:54 [PATCH 0/2] gcov: re-fix clang-11 support Nick Desaulniers
2021-04-07 18:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] gcov: re-fix clang-11+ support Nick Desaulniers
2021-04-07 19:51   ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-04-07 21:21   ` Andrew Morton
2021-04-07 21:28     ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-04-07 22:26       ` Andrew Morton
2021-04-08 18:46         ` [PATCH v2] " Nick Desaulniers
2021-04-07 18:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] gcov: re-drop support for clang-10 Nick Desaulniers
2021-04-07 19:07   ` Fangrui Song [this message]
2021-04-07 19:51   ` Nathan Chancellor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210407190749.p3h72h4zlshiyt76@google.com \
    --to=maskray@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=psodagud@quicinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®