From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] srcu: Fix broken node geometry after early ssp init
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 21:46:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210418044616.GE5006@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210417131649.GA146778@lothringen>
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 03:16:49PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 08:55:38AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> > > index 75ed367d5b60..24db97cbf76b 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> > > @@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ extern void resched_cpu(int cpu);
> > > extern int rcu_num_lvls;
> > > extern int num_rcu_lvl[];
> > > extern int rcu_num_nodes;
> > > +extern bool rcu_geometry_initialized;
> >
> > Can this be a static local variable inside rcu_init_geometry()?
> >
> > After all, init_srcu_struct() isn't called all that often, and its overhead
> > is such that an extra function call and check is going to hurt it. This
> > of course requires removing __init from rcu_init_geometry(), but it is not
> > all that large, so why not just remove the __init?
> >
> > But if we really are worried about reclaiming rcu_init_geometry()'s
> > instructions (maybe we are?), then rcu_init_geometry() can be split
> > into a function that just does the check (which is not __init) and the
> > remainder of the function, which could remain __init.
>
> There you go:
Queued, thank you!
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 16:10:36 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] srcu: Fix broken node geometry after early ssp init
>
> An ssp initialized before rcu_init_geometry() will have its snp hierarchy
> based on CONFIG_NR_CPUS.
>
> Once rcu_init_geometry() is called, the nodes distribution is shrinked
> and optimized toward meeting the actual possible number of CPUs detected
> on boot.
>
> Later on, the ssp that was initialized before rcu_init_geometry() is
> confused and sometimes refers to its initial CONFIG_NR_CPUS based node
> hierarchy, sometimes to the new num_possible_cpus() based one instead.
> For example each of its sdp->mynode remain backward and refer to the
> early node leaves that may not exist anymore. On the other hand the
> srcu_for_each_node_breadth_first() refers to the new node hierarchy.
>
> There are at least two bad possible outcomes to this:
>
> 1) a) A callback enqueued early on an sdp is recorded pending on
> sdp->mynode->srcu_data_have_cbs in srcu_funnel_gp_start() with
> sdp->mynode pointing to a deep leaf (say 3 levels).
>
> b) The grace period ends after rcu_init_geometry() which shrinks the
> nodes level to a single one. srcu_gp_end() walks through the new
> snp hierarchy without ever reaching the old leaves so the callback
> is never executed.
>
> This is easily reproduced on an 8 CPUs machine with
> CONFIG_NR_CPUS >= 32 and "rcupdate.rcu_self_test=1". The
> srcu_barrier() after early tests verification never completes and
> the boot hangs:
>
> [ 5413.141029] INFO: task swapper/0:1 blocked for more than 4915 seconds.
> [ 5413.147564] Not tainted 5.12.0-rc4+ #28
> [ 5413.151927] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> [ 5413.159753] task:swapper/0 state:D stack: 0 pid: 1 ppid: 0 flags:0x00004000
> [ 5413.168099] Call Trace:
> [ 5413.170555] __schedule+0x36c/0x930
> [ 5413.174057] ? wait_for_completion+0x88/0x110
> [ 5413.178423] schedule+0x46/0xf0
> [ 5413.181575] schedule_timeout+0x284/0x380
> [ 5413.185591] ? wait_for_completion+0x88/0x110
> [ 5413.189957] ? mark_held_locks+0x61/0x80
> [ 5413.193882] ? mark_held_locks+0x61/0x80
> [ 5413.197809] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50
> [ 5413.202173] ? wait_for_completion+0x88/0x110
> [ 5413.206535] wait_for_completion+0xb4/0x110
> [ 5413.210724] ? srcu_torture_stats_print+0x110/0x110
> [ 5413.215610] srcu_barrier+0x187/0x200
> [ 5413.219277] ? rcu_tasks_verify_self_tests+0x50/0x50
> [ 5413.224244] ? rdinit_setup+0x2b/0x2b
> [ 5413.227907] rcu_verify_early_boot_tests+0x2d/0x40
> [ 5413.232700] do_one_initcall+0x63/0x310
> [ 5413.236541] ? rdinit_setup+0x2b/0x2b
> [ 5413.240207] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x52/0x80
> [ 5413.244912] kernel_init_freeable+0x253/0x28f
> [ 5413.249273] ? rest_init+0x250/0x250
> [ 5413.252846] kernel_init+0xa/0x110
> [ 5413.256257] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
>
> 2) An ssp that gets initialized before rcu_init_geometry() and used
> afterward will always have stale rdp->mynode references, resulting in
> callbacks to be missed in srcu_gp_end(), just like in the previous
> scenario.
>
> Solve this with initializing nodes geometry whenever an struct srcu_state
> happens to be initialized before rcu_init(). This way we make sure the
> RCU nodes hierarchy is properly built and distributed before the nodes
> of an struct srcu_state are allocated.
>
> Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
> Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/rcu.h | 2 ++
> kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 3 +++
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> index 75ed367d5b60..edba5976ca17 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
> @@ -308,6 +308,8 @@ static inline void rcu_init_levelspread(int *levelspread, const int *levelcnt)
> }
> }
>
> +extern void rcu_init_geometry(void);
> +
> /* Returns a pointer to the first leaf rcu_node structure. */
> #define rcu_first_leaf_node() (rcu_state.level[rcu_num_lvls - 1])
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> index 55bc9473562b..9efd5eeb5dd5 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,9 @@ static void init_srcu_struct_nodes(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
> struct srcu_node *snp;
> struct srcu_node *snp_first;
>
> + /* First make sure the nodes hierarchy is properly built */
> + rcu_init_geometry();
> +
> /* Work out the overall tree geometry. */
> ssp->level[0] = &ssp->node[0];
> for (i = 1; i < rcu_num_lvls; i++)
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 51600ef3fb0c..906f81786ca5 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -4617,11 +4617,26 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(void)
> * replace the definitions in tree.h because those are needed to size
> * the ->node array in the rcu_state structure.
> */
> -static void __init rcu_init_geometry(void)
> +void rcu_init_geometry(void)
> {
> ulong d;
> int i;
> + static unsigned long old_nr_cpu_ids;
> int rcu_capacity[RCU_NUM_LVLS];
> + static bool initialized;
> +
> + if (initialized) {
> + /*
> + * Arrange for warning if rcu_init_geometry() was called before
> + * setup_nr_cpu_ids(). We may miss cases when
> + * nr_cpus_ids == NR_CPUS but that shouldn't matter too much.
> + */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(old_nr_cpu_ids != nr_cpu_ids);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + old_nr_cpu_ids = nr_cpu_ids;
> + initialized = true;
>
> /*
> * Initialize any unspecified boot parameters.
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-18 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-14 13:24 [PATCH 0/2] srcu: Fix early boot hang v3 Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-14 13:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] srcu: Fix broken node geometry after early ssp init Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-14 15:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-16 23:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-17 13:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-18 4:46 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2021-04-19 0:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-19 17:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-14 13:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] srcu: Early test SRCU polling start Frederic Weisbecker
2021-04-14 15:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210418044616.GE5006@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1 \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®