From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,
	USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D8CC433ED
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:35:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E3A5613CF
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:35:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S232875AbhDTPfc (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:35:32 -0400
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41592 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S232764AbhDTPfc (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:35:32 -0400
Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16FBC613B2;
        Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:34:58 +0000 (UTC)
Date:   Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:34:56 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        fweisbec <fweisbec@gmail.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, chris <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
        yuanhan liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>,
        Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] tracing: Enable tracepoints via module parameters
Message-ID: <20210420113456.46755ce7@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <1672102317.2266.1618931710794.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
References: <1299622684.20306.77.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
        <20130814233228.778f25d0@gandalf.local.home>
        <77a6e40b57df092d1bd8967305906a210f286111.camel@intel.com>
        <20210419181111.5eb582e8@gandalf.local.home>
        <CAPcyv4gw7KoL8U66LLx_DVAE+5Jguz7tb3Rax-bdTz4BrpwhvQ@mail.gmail.com>
        <20210420085532.4062b15e@gandalf.local.home>
        <1154727029.2004.1618925367044.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
        <20210420105511.65490e8d@gandalf.local.home>
        <1672102317.2266.1618931710794.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:15:10 -0400 (EDT)
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:

> That sounds fine. So that would be within the "trace_event" (and not tracepoint)
> namespace for module load parameters as well ?

Right, it would be "trace_event=...." not "tracepoint=..."

-- Steve