From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F0DC433B4 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 13:31:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD1A61077 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 13:31:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232492AbhDTNcY (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:32:24 -0400 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:17805 "EHLO szxga07-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232171AbhDTNcR (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:32:17 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga07-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FPl022kKBzBrVQ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:29:22 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.104.175) by DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 21:31:38 +0800 From: Miaohe Lin To: CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] swap: fix do_swap_page() race with swapoff Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:30:46 -0400 Message-ID: <20210420133048.6773-3-linmiaohe@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20210420133048.6773-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com> References: <20210420133048.6773-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: [10.175.104.175] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org When I was investigating the swap code, I found the below possible race window: CPU 1 CPU 2 ----- ----- do_swap_page if (data_race(si->flags & SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO) swap_readpage if (data_race(sis->flags & SWP_FS_OPS)) { swapoff p->flags &= ~SWP_VALID; .. synchronize_rcu(); .. p->swap_file = NULL; struct file *swap_file = sis->swap_file; struct address_space *mapping = swap_file->f_mapping;[oops!] Note that for the pages that are swapped in through swap cache, this isn't an issue. Because the page is locked, and the swap entry will be marked with SWAP_HAS_CACHE, so swapoff() can not proceed until the page has been unlocked. Using current get/put_swap_device() to guard against concurrent swapoff for swap_readpage() looks terrible because swap_readpage() may take really long time. And this race may not be really pernicious because swapoff is usually done when system shutdown only. To reduce the performance overhead on the hot-path as much as possible, it appears we can use the percpu_ref to close this race window(as suggested by Huang, Ying). Fixes: 0bcac06f27d7 ("mm,swap: skip swapcache for swapin of synchronous device") Reported-by: kernel test robot (auto build test ERROR) Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin --- include/linux/swap.h | 9 +++++++++ mm/memory.c | 9 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h index c9e7fea10b83..46d51d058d05 100644 --- a/include/linux/swap.h +++ b/include/linux/swap.h @@ -527,6 +527,15 @@ static inline struct swap_info_struct *swp_swap_info(swp_entry_t entry) return NULL; } +static inline struct swap_info_struct *get_swap_device(swp_entry_t entry) +{ + return NULL; +} + +static inline void put_swap_device(struct swap_info_struct *si) +{ +} + #define swap_address_space(entry) (NULL) #define get_nr_swap_pages() 0L #define total_swap_pages 0L diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index 27014c3bde9f..7a2fe12cf641 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -3311,6 +3311,7 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) { struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma; struct page *page = NULL, *swapcache; + struct swap_info_struct *si = NULL; swp_entry_t entry; pte_t pte; int locked; @@ -3338,6 +3339,10 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) goto out; } + /* Prevent swapoff from happening to us. */ + si = get_swap_device(entry); + if (unlikely(!si)) + goto out; delayacct_set_flag(current, DELAYACCT_PF_SWAPIN); page = lookup_swap_cache(entry, vma, vmf->address); @@ -3514,6 +3519,8 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) unlock: pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl); out: + if (si) + put_swap_device(si); return ret; out_nomap: pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl); @@ -3525,6 +3532,8 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) unlock_page(swapcache); put_page(swapcache); } + if (si) + put_swap_device(si); return ret; } -- 2.19.1