From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com,
sthemmin@microsoft.com, wei.liu@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
decui@microsoft.com
Subject: Re: ** POTENTIAL FRAUD ALERT - RED HAT ** [PATCH v2 1/1] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Increase wait time for VMbus unload
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:46:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210420194642.hnonoj4fftmktciy@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tuo1i9o5.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:31:54AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com> writes:
>
> > When running in Azure, disks may be connected to a Linux VM with
> > read/write caching enabled. If a VM panics and issues a VMbus
> > UNLOAD request to Hyper-V, the response is delayed until all dirty
> > data in the disk cache is flushed. In extreme cases, this flushing
> > can take 10's of seconds, depending on the disk speed and the amount
> > of dirty data. If kdump is configured for the VM, the current 10 second
> > timeout in vmbus_wait_for_unload() may be exceeded, and the UNLOAD
> > complete message may arrive well after the kdump kernel is already
> > running, causing problems. Note that no problem occurs if kdump is
> > not enabled because Hyper-V waits for the cache flush before doing
> > a reboot through the BIOS/UEFI code.
> >
> > Fix this problem by increasing the timeout in vmbus_wait_for_unload()
> > to 100 seconds. Also output periodic messages so that if anyone is
> > watching the serial console, they won't think the VM is completely
> > hung.
> >
> > Fixes: 911e1987efc8 ("Drivers: hv: vmbus: Add timeout to vmbus_wait_for_unload")
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Applied to hyperv-next. Thanks.
> > ---
[...]
> >
> > +#define UNLOAD_DELAY_UNIT_MS 10 /* 10 milliseconds */
> > +#define UNLOAD_WAIT_MS (100*1000) /* 100 seconds */
> > +#define UNLOAD_WAIT_LOOPS (UNLOAD_WAIT_MS/UNLOAD_DELAY_UNIT_MS)
> > +#define UNLOAD_MSG_MS (5*1000) /* Every 5 seconds */
> > +#define UNLOAD_MSG_LOOPS (UNLOAD_MSG_MS/UNLOAD_DELAY_UNIT_MS)
> > +
> > static void vmbus_wait_for_unload(void)
> > {
> > int cpu;
> > @@ -772,12 +778,17 @@ static void vmbus_wait_for_unload(void)
> > * vmbus_connection.unload_event. If not, the last thing we can do is
> > * read message pages for all CPUs directly.
> > *
> > - * Wait no more than 10 seconds so that the panic path can't get
> > - * hung forever in case the response message isn't seen.
> > + * Wait up to 100 seconds since an Azure host must writeback any dirty
> > + * data in its disk cache before the VMbus UNLOAD request will
> > + * complete. This flushing has been empirically observed to take up
> > + * to 50 seconds in cases with a lot of dirty data, so allow additional
> > + * leeway and for inaccuracies in mdelay(). But eventually time out so
> > + * that the panic path can't get hung forever in case the response
> > + * message isn't seen.
>
> I vaguely remember debugging cases when CHANNELMSG_UNLOAD_RESPONSE never
> arrives, it was kind of pointless to proceed to kexec as attempts to
> reconnect Vmbus devices were failing (no devices were offered after
> CHANNELMSG_REQUESTOFFERS AFAIR). Would it maybe make sense to just do
> emergency reboot instead of proceeding to kexec when this happens? Just
> wondering.
>
Please submit a follow-up patch if necessary.
Wei.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-20 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-20 4:48 Michael Kelley
2021-04-20 9:31 ` ** POTENTIAL FRAUD ALERT - RED HAT ** " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-04-20 19:46 ` Wei Liu [this message]
2021-04-20 21:23 ` Michael Kelley
2021-04-21 8:24 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210420194642.hnonoj4fftmktciy@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2 \
--to=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®