Re: wrong patch order

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 10:14:51 -0700 Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> In the next-20210426 I see the commit 7c3c0a5796a8 "h8300:
> rearrange headers inclusion order in asm/bitops" is applied after
> a54cbe7fa597 "lib: add fast path for find_next_*_bit()".
> 
> This may cause cause build failure for h8300 while bisecting.
> 
> Can you please change order of the patches so that 7c3c0a5796a8 would
> follow 68b80f24c2f6 "arch: rearrange headers inclusion order in
> asm/bitops for m68k and sh"? It's also possible to merge 7c3c0a5796a8
> and 68b80f24c2f6 because they address the same issue.

I renamed
lib-add-fast-path-for-find_first__bit-and-find_last_bit-fix.patch to
arch-rearrange-headers-inclusion-order-in-asm-bitops-for-m68k-and-sh-fix.patch
and queued it immediately after
arch-rearrange-headers-inclusion-order-in-asm-bitops-for-m68k-and-sh.patch,
as a fix against
arch-rearrange-headers-inclusion-order-in-asm-bitops-for-m68k-and-sh.patch,
to be folded into
arch-rearrange-headers-inclusion-order-in-asm-bitops-for-m68k-and-sh.patch

tools-disable-wno-type-limits.patch
tools-bitmap-sync-function-declarations-with-the-kernel.patch
tools-sync-bitmap_last_word_mask-macro-with-the-kernel.patch
arch-rearrange-headers-inclusion-order-in-asm-bitops-for-m68k-and-sh.patch
arch-rearrange-headers-inclusion-order-in-asm-bitops-for-m68k-and-sh-fix.patch
lib-extend-the-scope-of-small_const_nbits-macro.patch
tools-sync-small_const_nbits-macro-with-the-kernel.patch
lib-inline-_find_next_bit-wrappers.patch
tools-sync-find_next_bit-implementation.patch
lib-add-fast-path-for-find_next__bit.patch
lib-add-fast-path-for-find_first__bit-and-find_last_bit.patch
tools-sync-lib-find_bit-implementation.patch
maintainers-add-entry-for-the-bitmap-api.patch