From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] alarmtimer: check RTC features instead of ops
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 23:49:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210429214902.2612338-1-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> (raw)
Test RTC_FEATURE_ALARM instead of relying on ops->set_alarm to know whether
alarms are available.
Fixes: 7ae41220ef58 ("rtc: introduce features bitfield")
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
---
Hello,
This doesn't seem much but this solve an issue where following a change in the
RTC driver, this part of the code will think the RTC is alarm capable while it
is not, then breaking the alarmtimer functionnality.
kernel/time/alarmtimer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c b/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
index 98d7a15e8cf6..4d7a6dffa1e5 100644
--- a/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int alarmtimer_rtc_add_device(struct device *dev,
if (rtcdev)
return -EBUSY;
- if (!rtc->ops->set_alarm)
+ if (!test_bit(RTC_FEATURE_ALARM, rtc->features))
return -1;
if (!device_may_wakeup(rtc->dev.parent))
return -1;
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-04-29 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-29 21:49 Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2021-04-30 7:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-30 8:10 ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-04-30 8:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-03 15:34 ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-05-03 18:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-08 0:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210429214902.2612338-1-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®