From: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, valentin.schneider@arm.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, corbet@lwn.net,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] sched/doc: Update the CPU capacity asymmetry bits
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 17:33:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210510163329.GA8567@e120325.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79223641-6b3e-6b48-50df-3a9c73c003cd@infradead.org>
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:19:10AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 4/28/21 2:32 AM, Beata Michalska wrote:
> > Update the documentation bits referring to capacity aware scheduling
> > with regards to newly introduced SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL shed_domain
>
> sched_domain
> I guess.
>
> > flag.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst | 6 ++++--
> > Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst
> > index 9b7cbe4..92d16e7 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst
> > @@ -284,8 +284,10 @@ whether the system exhibits asymmetric CPU capacities. Should that be the
> > case:
> >
> > - The sched_asym_cpucapacity static key will be enabled.
> > -- The SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY flag will be set at the lowest sched_domain level that
> > - spans all unique CPU capacity values.
> > +- The SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL flag will be set at the lowest sched_domain
> > + level that spans all unique CPU capacity values.
> > +- The SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY flag will be set for any sched_domain that spans
> > + cpus with any range of asymmetry.
>
> CPUs
> please.
>
> >
> > The sched_asym_cpucapacity static key is intended to guard sections of code that
> > cater to asymmetric CPU capacity systems. Do note however that said key is
> > diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst
> > index afe02d3..8fbce5e 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst
> > @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ section lists these dependencies and provides hints as to how they can be met.
> >
> > As mentioned in the introduction, EAS is only supported on platforms with
> > asymmetric CPU topologies for now. This requirement is checked at run-time by
> > -looking for the presence of the SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY flag when the scheduling
> > +looking for the presence of the SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL flag when the scheduling
> > domains are built.
> >
> > See Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst for requirements to be met for this
> >
>
Thank you for having a look!
Fixes applied to v3.
---
BR
B.
> thanks.
> --
> ~Randy
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-10 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-28 9:32 [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection Beata Michalska
2021-04-28 9:32 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] sched/core: Introduce SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL sched_domain flag Beata Michalska
2021-04-28 9:32 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] sched/topology: Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection Beata Michalska
2021-05-05 18:17 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-04-28 9:32 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] sched/doc: Update the CPU capacity asymmetry bits Beata Michalska
2021-04-28 17:19 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-05-10 16:33 ` Beata Michalska [this message]
2021-05-05 18:17 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection Valentin Schneider
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210510163329.GA8567@e120325.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=beata.michalska@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®