From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] alarmtimer: check RTC features instead of ops
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 03:45:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210511014516.563031-1-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> (raw)
RTC drivers used to leave .set_alarm() NULL in order to signal the RTC
device doesn't support alarms. The drivers are now clearing the
RTC_FEATURE_ALARM bit for that purpose in order to keep the rtc_class_ops
structure const. So now, .set_alarm() is set unconditionally and this
possibly causes the alarmtimer code to select an RTC device that doesn't
support alarms.
Test RTC_FEATURE_ALARM instead of relying on ops->set_alarm to determine
whether alarms are available.
Fixes: 7ae41220ef58 ("rtc: introduce features bitfield")
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
---
kernel/time/alarmtimer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c b/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
index bea9d08b1698..5897828b9d7e 100644
--- a/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/alarmtimer.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int alarmtimer_rtc_add_device(struct device *dev,
if (rtcdev)
return -EBUSY;
- if (!rtc->ops->set_alarm)
+ if (!test_bit(RTC_FEATURE_ALARM, rtc->features))
return -1;
if (!device_may_wakeup(rtc->dev.parent))
return -1;
--
2.31.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-05-11 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-11 1:45 Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2021-05-11 19:32 ` [tip: timers/urgent] alarmtimer: Check " tip-bot2 for Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210511014516.563031-1-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®