From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D71C433ED for ; Thu, 13 May 2021 14:02:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE8D6127A for ; Thu, 13 May 2021 14:02:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234351AbhEMODS (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2021 10:03:18 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:36178 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234291AbhEMOC6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2021 10:02:58 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B84169E; Thu, 13 May 2021 07:01:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e120325.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A56443F73B; Thu, 13 May 2021 07:01:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 15:01:43 +0100 From: Beata Michalska To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, valentin.schneider@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, corbet@lwn.net, rdunlap@infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] sched/topology: Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection Message-ID: <20210513140141.GC15289@e120325.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1620664258-11045-1-git-send-email-beata.michalska@arm.com> <1620664258-11045-3-git-send-email-beata.michalska@arm.com> <20210513134832.GB15289@e120325.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 03:59:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 02:48:32PM +0100, Beata Michalska wrote: > > > > > Where: > > > > arch_scale_cpu_capacity(L) = 512 > > > > arch_scale_cpu_capacity(M) = 871 > > > > arch_scale_cpu_capacity(B) = 1024 > > > > > > Low, High > > > Small, Big > > > > > > But you appear to have picked: Low and Big, which just doesn't make any > > > sense. (Worse, L can also be Large :-) > > > > > (L)ittle, (M)edium, (B)ig > > I can re-arrange the abbreviations used here. > > Duh, I must really be having a bad day for not thinking of Little. I > don't think you need to change this. S,M,L would be like a clothing > store, but steps away from the big.Little thing. > That's how I would prefer it - keep the 'little' things Thanks --- BR B.