From: Gao Yan <gao.yanB@h3c.com>
To: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
<paulus@samba.org>, <davem@davemloft.net>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Gao Yan <gao.yanB@h3c.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: remove unnecessary disc_data_lock in ppp line discipline
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 15:57:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210521075726.20568-1-gao.yanB@h3c.com> (raw)
In tty layer, it use tty->ldisc_sem(using tty_ldisc_ref_wait and
tty_ldisc_deref) to proect tty_ldisc_ops.
So I think tty->ldisc_sem can also protect tty->disc_data;
For examlpe, When cpu A is running ppp_synctty_ioctl that hold
the tty->ldisc_sem, at the same time if cpu B calls ppp_synctty_close,
it will wait until cpu A release tty->ldisc_sem.
So I think it is unnecessary to define additional disc_data_lock;
cpu A cpu B
tty_ioctl tty_reopen
->hold tty->ldisc_sem ->hold tty->ldisc_sem(write), failed
->ld->ops->ioctl ->wait...
->release tty->ldisc_sem ->wait...OK,hold tty->ldisc_sem
->tty_ldisc_reinit
->tty_ldisc_close
->ld->ops->close
Signed-off-by: Gao Yan <gao.yanB@h3c.com>
---
drivers/net/ppp/ppp_async.c | 11 ++---------
drivers/net/ppp/ppp_synctty.c | 11 ++---------
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_async.c b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_async.c
index 8b41aa3fb..7bc4846f5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_async.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_async.c
@@ -127,17 +127,13 @@ static const struct ppp_channel_ops async_ops = {
* FIXME: this is no longer true. The _close path for the ldisc is
* now guaranteed to be sane.
*/
-static DEFINE_RWLOCK(disc_data_lock);
static struct asyncppp *ap_get(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
- struct asyncppp *ap;
+ struct asyncppp *ap = tty->disc_data;
- read_lock(&disc_data_lock);
- ap = tty->disc_data;
if (ap != NULL)
refcount_inc(&ap->refcnt);
- read_unlock(&disc_data_lock);
return ap;
}
@@ -214,12 +210,9 @@ ppp_asynctty_open(struct tty_struct *tty)
static void
ppp_asynctty_close(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
- struct asyncppp *ap;
+ struct asyncppp *ap = tty->disc_data;
- write_lock_irq(&disc_data_lock);
- ap = tty->disc_data;
tty->disc_data = NULL;
- write_unlock_irq(&disc_data_lock);
if (!ap)
return;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_synctty.c b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_synctty.c
index 576b6a93b..812f309c5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_synctty.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_synctty.c
@@ -129,17 +129,13 @@ ppp_print_buffer (const char *name, const __u8 *buf, int count)
*
* FIXME: Fixed in tty_io nowadays.
*/
-static DEFINE_RWLOCK(disc_data_lock);
static struct syncppp *sp_get(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
- struct syncppp *ap;
+ struct syncppp *ap = tty->disc_data;
- read_lock(&disc_data_lock);
- ap = tty->disc_data;
if (ap != NULL)
refcount_inc(&ap->refcnt);
- read_unlock(&disc_data_lock);
return ap;
}
@@ -213,12 +209,9 @@ ppp_sync_open(struct tty_struct *tty)
static void
ppp_sync_close(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
- struct syncppp *ap;
+ struct syncppp *ap = tty->disc_data;
- write_lock_irq(&disc_data_lock);
- ap = tty->disc_data;
tty->disc_data = NULL;
- write_unlock_irq(&disc_data_lock);
if (!ap)
return;
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-05-21 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-21 7:57 Gao Yan [this message]
2021-05-21 8:33 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210521075726.20568-1-gao.yanB@h3c.com \
--to=gao.yanb@h3c.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®