From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3F0C2B9F8 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 16:07:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E6A61408 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 16:07:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234342AbhEYQJU (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2021 12:09:20 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:56637 "EHLO mout01.posteo.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231810AbhEYQJT (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2021 12:09:19 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEA41240026 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 18:07:47 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1621958867; bh=xt/SopiWlESxzNwmc3NPZy2Luzt/f001p+eAUG5rr1o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=Y31x9xhfN0sByjHP/00JXAVZaR7cJ6bnNPAvuTQhZMkYSFCLRMyKIWZ8v526ml7Sy thD+/pZdqjA3JBEY+mqoTGeA7LtOftwtykJQAnYH6SOSdbwvvFyg4vV4+PfjvtwE0N +Fll5chsETJ5zl/qQQ76n0m/EKycg9VTLnmS0WNm63Zum1rOp9Wixbjl38zpJCaLe/ i+PbYYKJ8QmGWH9VMbqicDSd58bK5jhxKMpu19e5YASM+bSolVpO6Z4cW4oLWh6hDD uysoo2n1knq8qMYo0W19J0Nl0C2iPlhSrwyMVB0ueZFJWLqPDRakVmflAfQmnuqifs CKrLNfA4LX2xA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4FqJrd28pDz6tmQ; Tue, 25 May 2021 18:07:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 16:07:44 +0000 From: Wilken Gottwalt To: Samuel Holland Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ohad Ben-Cohen , Bjorn Andersson , Baolin Wang , Rob Herring , Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] hwspinlock: add sun6i hardware spinlock support Message-ID: <20210525180744.24187bb1@monster.powergraphx.local> In-Reply-To: <95e93676-cfcf-1aed-1741-d69b72286033@sholland.org> References: <95e93676-cfcf-1aed-1741-d69b72286033@sholland.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 23:33:31 -0500 Samuel Holland wrote: > On 3/14/21 4:30 AM, Wilken Gottwalt wrote: > > Wilken Gottwalt (2): > > dt-bindings: hwlock: add sun6i_hwspinlock > > hwspinlock: add sun6i hardware spinlock support > > > > .../allwinner,sun6i-a31-hwspinlock.yaml | 45 ++++ > > MAINTAINERS | 6 + > > drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig | 9 + > > drivers/hwspinlock/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/hwspinlock/sun6i_hwspinlock.c | 210 ++++++++++++++++++ > > 5 files changed, 271 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/allwinner,sun6i-a31-hwspinlock.yaml > > create mode 100644 drivers/hwspinlock/sun6i_hwspinlock.c > > > > Thanks for the very thorough testing! So when will this end up in mainstream? Or do I have to somehing to get this triggered? This is not my first driver and back then it was included into mainline without anything special on my side. I'm a bit confused. Did I miss something? greetings, Will > For both patches: > Reviewed-by: Samuel Holland