From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
David.Laight@aculab.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
akinobu.mita@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxarm@huawei.com, prime.zeng@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] libfs: fix error cast of negative value in simple_attr_write()
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 09:09:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210603160904.GA983893@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1605341356-11872-1-git-send-email-yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 04:09:16PM +0800, Yicong Yang wrote:
> The attr->set() receive a value of u64, but simple_strtoll() is used
> for doing the conversion. It will lead to the error cast if user inputs
> a negative value.
>
> Use kstrtoull() instead of simple_strtoll() to convert a string got
> from the user to an unsigned value. The former will return '-EINVAL' if
> it gets a negetive value, but the latter can't handle the situation
> correctly. Make 'val' unsigned long long as what kstrtoull() takes, this
> will eliminate the compile warning on no 64-bit architectures.
>
> Fixes: f7b88631a897 ("fs/libfs.c: fix simple_attr_write() on 32bit machines")
> Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
> ---
> Change since v1:
> - address the compile warning for non-64 bit platform.
> Change since v2:
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/1605000324-7428-1-git-send-email-yangyicong@hisilicon.com/
> - make 'val' unsigned long long and mentioned in the commit
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/1605261369-551-1-git-send-email-yangyicong@hisilicon.com/
Belated error report on this. Some validation team just moved to
v5.10 and found their error injection scripts no longer work.
They have been using:
# echo $((-1 << 12)) > /sys/kernel/debug/apei/einj/param2
to write the mask value 0xfffffffffffff000 for many years ... but
now writing a negative value (-4096) to this file gives an EINVAL error.
Maybe they've been taking advantage of a bug all this time? The
comment for debugfs_create_x64() says it is for reading/writing
an unsigned value. But when a bug fix breaks user code ... then
we are supposed to ask whether that bug is actually a feature.
If there was a debugfs_create_s64() I might just fix einj.c to
use that ... but there isn't :-(
-Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-03 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-14 8:09 Yicong Yang
2021-06-03 16:09 ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2021-06-07 9:26 ` Yicong Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210603160904.GA983893@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=prime.zeng@huawei.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®