mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>,
	Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/15] KVM: nVMX: Consolidate VM-Enter/VM-Exit TLB flush and MMU sync logic
Date: Wed,  9 Jun 2021 16:42:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210609234235.1244004-9-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210609234235.1244004-1-seanjc@google.com>

Drop the dedicated nested_vmx_transition_mmu_sync() now that the MMU sync
is handled via KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH_GUEST, and fold that flush into the
all-encompassing nested_vmx_transition_tlb_flush().

Opportunistically add a comment explaning why nested EPT never needs to
sync the MMU on VM-Enter.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 91 +++++++++++----------------------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index 3fb87e5aead4..6d7c368c92e7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -1057,48 +1057,6 @@ static void prepare_vmx_msr_autostore_list(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	}
 }
 
-/*
- * Returns true if the MMU needs to be sync'd on nested VM-Enter/VM-Exit.
- * tl;dr: the MMU needs a sync if L0 is using shadow paging and L1 didn't
- * enable VPID for L2 (implying it expects a TLB flush on VMX transitions).
- * Here's why.
- *
- * If EPT is enabled by L0 a sync is never needed:
- * - if it is disabled by L1, then L0 is not shadowing L1 or L2 PTEs, there
- *   cannot be unsync'd SPTEs for either L1 or L2.
- *
- * - if it is also enabled by L1, then L0 doesn't need to sync on VM-Enter
- *   VM-Enter as VM-Enter isn't required to invalidate guest-physical mappings
- *   (irrespective of VPID), i.e. L1 can't rely on the (virtual) CPU to flush
- *   stale guest-physical mappings for L2 from the TLB.  And as above, L0 isn't
- *   shadowing L1 PTEs so there are no unsync'd SPTEs to sync on VM-Exit.
- *
- * If EPT is disabled by L0:
- * - if VPID is enabled by L1 (for L2), the situation is similar to when L1
- *   enables EPT: L0 doesn't need to sync as VM-Enter and VM-Exit aren't
- *   required to invalidate linear mappings (EPT is disabled so there are
- *   no combined or guest-physical mappings), i.e. L1 can't rely on the
- *   (virtual) CPU to flush stale linear mappings for either L2 or itself (L1).
- *
- * - however if VPID is disabled by L1, then a sync is needed as L1 expects all
- *   linear mappings (EPT is disabled so there are no combined or guest-physical
- *   mappings) to be invalidated on both VM-Enter and VM-Exit.
- *
- * Note, this logic is subtly different than nested_has_guest_tlb_tag(), which
- * additionally checks that L2 has been assigned a VPID (when EPT is disabled).
- * Whether or not L2 has been assigned a VPID by L0 is irrelevant with respect
- * to L1's expectations, e.g. L0 needs to invalidate hardware TLB entries if L2
- * doesn't have a unique VPID to prevent reusing L1's entries (assuming L1 has
- * been assigned a VPID), but L0 doesn't need to do a MMU sync because L1
- * doesn't expect stale (virtual) TLB entries to be flushed, i.e. L1 doesn't
- * know that L0 will flush the TLB and so L1 will do INVVPID as needed to flush
- * stale TLB entries, at which point L0 will sync L2's MMU.
- */
-static bool nested_vmx_transition_mmu_sync(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
-	return !enable_ept && !nested_cpu_has_vpid(get_vmcs12(vcpu));
-}
-
 /*
  * Load guest's/host's cr3 at nested entry/exit.  @nested_ept is true if we are
  * emulating VM-Entry into a guest with EPT enabled.  On failure, the expected
@@ -1125,18 +1083,9 @@ static int nested_vmx_load_cr3(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr3, bool ne
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (!nested_ept) {
+	if (!nested_ept)
 		kvm_mmu_new_pgd(vcpu, cr3);
 
-		/*
-		 * A TLB flush on VM-Enter/VM-Exit flushes all linear mappings
-		 * across all PCIDs, i.e. all PGDs need to be synchronized.
-		 * See nested_vmx_transition_mmu_sync() for more details.
-		 */
-		if (nested_vmx_transition_mmu_sync(vcpu))
-			kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH_GUEST, vcpu);
-	}
-
 	vcpu->arch.cr3 = cr3;
 	kvm_register_mark_available(vcpu, VCPU_EXREG_CR3);
 
@@ -1172,18 +1121,29 @@ static void nested_vmx_transition_tlb_flush(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 {
 	struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
 
-	/*
-	 * If VPID is disabled, linear and combined mappings are flushed on
-	 * VM-Enter/VM-Exit, and guest-physical mappings are valid only for
-	 * their associated EPTP.
-	 */
-	if (!enable_vpid)
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * If vmcs12 doesn't use VPID, L1 expects linear and combined mappings
-	 * for *all* contexts to be flushed on VM-Enter/VM-Exit.
+	 * for *all* contexts to be flushed on VM-Enter/VM-Exit, i.e. it's a
+	 * full TLB flush from the guest's perspective.  This is required even
+	 * if VPID is disabled in the host as KVM may need to synchronize the
+	 * MMU in response to the guest TLB flush.
 	 *
+	 * Note, using TLB_FLUSH_GUEST is correct even if nested EPT is in use.
+	 * EPT is a special snowflake, as guest-physical mappings aren't
+	 * flushed on VPID invalidations, including VM-Enter or VM-Exit with
+	 * VPID disabled.  As a result, KVM _never_ needs to sync nEPT
+	 * entries on VM-Enter because L1 can't rely on VM-Enter to flush
+	 * those mappings.
+	 */
+	if (!nested_cpu_has_vpid(vmcs12)) {
+		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH_GUEST, vcpu);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	/* L2 should never have a VPID if VPID is disabled. */
+	WARN_ON(!enable_vpid);
+
+	/*
 	 * If VPID is enabled and used by vmc12, but L2 does not have a unique
 	 * TLB tag (ASID), i.e. EPT is disabled and KVM was unable to allocate
 	 * a VPID for L2, flush the current context as the effective ASID is
@@ -1195,13 +1155,12 @@ static void nested_vmx_transition_tlb_flush(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	 *
 	 * If a TLB flush isn't required due to any of the above, and vpid12 is
 	 * changing then the new "virtual" VPID (vpid12) will reuse the same
-	 * "real" VPID (vpid02), and so needs to be sync'd.  There is no direct
+	 * "real" VPID (vpid02), and so needs to be flushed.  There's no direct
 	 * mapping between vpid02 and vpid12, vpid02 is per-vCPU and reused for
-	 * all nested vCPUs.
+	 * all nested vCPUs.  Remember, a flush on VM-Enter does not invalidate
+	 * guest-physical mappings, so there is no need to sync the nEPT MMU.
 	 */
-	if (!nested_cpu_has_vpid(vmcs12)) {
-		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH, vcpu);
-	} else if (!nested_has_guest_tlb_tag(vcpu)) {
+	if (!nested_has_guest_tlb_tag(vcpu)) {
 		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH_CURRENT, vcpu);
 	} else if (is_vmenter &&
 		   vmcs12->virtual_processor_id != vmx->nested.last_vpid) {
-- 
2.32.0.rc1.229.g3e70b5a671-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-09 23:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-09 23:42 [PATCH 00/15] KVM: x86/mmu: TLB fixes and related cleanups Sean Christopherson
2021-06-09 23:42 ` [PATCH 01/15] KVM: nVMX: Sync all PGDs on nested transition with shadow paging Sean Christopherson
2021-06-09 23:42 ` [PATCH 02/15] KVM: nVMX: Ensure 64-bit shift when checking VMFUNC bitmap Sean Christopherson
2021-06-09 23:42 ` [PATCH 03/15] KVM: nVMX: Don't clobber nested MMU's A/D status on EPTP switch Sean Christopherson
2021-06-09 23:42 ` [PATCH 04/15] KVM: x86: Invalidate all PGDs for the current PCID on MOV CR3 w/ flush Sean Christopherson
2021-06-09 23:42 ` [PATCH 05/15] KVM: x86: Uncondtionally skip MMU sync/TLB flush in MOV CR3's PGD switch Sean Christopherson
2021-06-09 23:42 ` [PATCH 06/15] KVM: nSVM: Move TLB flushing logic (or lack thereof) to dedicated helper Sean Christopherson
2021-06-09 23:42 ` [PATCH 07/15] KVM: x86: Drop skip MMU sync and TLB flush params from "new PGD" helpers Sean Christopherson
2021-06-09 23:42 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2021-06-09 23:42 ` [PATCH 09/15] KVM: nVMX: Free only guest_mode (L2) roots on INVVPID w/o EPT Sean Christopherson
2021-06-09 23:42 ` [PATCH 10/15] KVM: x86: Use KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH_GUEST to handle INVPCID(ALL) emulation Sean Christopherson
2021-06-09 23:42 ` [PATCH 11/15] KVM: nVMX: Use fast PGD switch when emulating VMFUNC[EPTP_SWITCH] Sean Christopherson
2021-06-09 23:42 ` [PATCH 12/15] KVM: x86: Defer MMU sync on PCID invalidation Sean Christopherson
2021-06-09 23:42 ` [PATCH 13/15] KVM: x86: Drop pointless @reset_roots from kvm_init_mmu() Sean Christopherson
2021-06-09 23:42 ` [PATCH 14/15] KVM: nVMX: WARN if subtly-impossible VMFUNC conditions occur Sean Christopherson
2021-06-09 23:42 ` [PATCH 15/15] KVM: nVMX: Drop redundant checks on vmcs12 in EPTP switching emulation Sean Christopherson
2021-06-10 16:09   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-10 16:10 ` [PATCH 00/15] KVM: x86/mmu: TLB fixes and related cleanups Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210609234235.1244004-9-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=junaids@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=laijs@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®