From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D02C48BE8 for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 16:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F6A61357 for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 16:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231380AbhFLQSu (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jun 2021 12:18:50 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f176.google.com ([209.85.215.176]:40745 "EHLO mail-pg1-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230200AbhFLQSs (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Jun 2021 12:18:48 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f176.google.com with SMTP id j12so5051792pgh.7 for ; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 09:16:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lixom-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=FIBH+1ri25R4Uf47pQvWLvTfi6oNPVbawYQKpiQ2b/A=; b=DeqTqzAAowohCmPiS8IGsqYIV4fl3weH6H3Aayb3mamD2WfIZaDoxzlkxl6BnIupGP z0EZpCZUdfXVaQu5C6ETuuG0g4Dyu1s59QURB10k1Qv410KqruM/aQQs7f3cv6iAtpP+ O0XtfhZilEZMJ7DsoNIcJseodaozutKRR6n+kGLAxqatqJSgNj16hUSQ9PtjcA71Cra1 apI09KFnEvciYpNuCM46vWeU5WBnfVk9zJZSroChKcWmD0hZACW6IddqOUck2k+9d3VV ebj9sjebAXjm1wTR4cai2uqtMyzZlRaBzEV5UcjplqKaSh/u9lGRRGGX8w486jXKarWC ToDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=FIBH+1ri25R4Uf47pQvWLvTfi6oNPVbawYQKpiQ2b/A=; b=Tp6MdVAxhIgGMQrkXJYEvd7DncKRrwHjgCNjcNkndSlmlK5ZkXXI9xBS/Ak7OsNl1k 47J0QuypwH9oRAjhIfyhP2D11IwvcVIhvtnIzt66mVx9FVfFBX6MboJM+zKcBNh/EU7m Ieqq6JGyQ8X6gkwmfjeyzIzXOLaTw+hbgSI0KA8LfRgulgL8ghSiRQUANoiqCdXV1oxB qBTEB7OVhuaNUHug2C5zgjU169mxJkwMg0dER5Lq7qr3QvIQSNA1KAToWjDyX2UG+ira Kx/5xELBEPfBxqs8GwFQciaJe95ymMRF6+uB5AHnPY9Pov6wLxcXLqa/D+KmAjQolR1e jLww== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530TYVSZQFcLKmHgbT8Q5IgBrnpS/NZO6vFPTDsGWxZ+0Q6u8tPU hahV/oysTA3JqIzxTwv9uGoa0Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyiBAGmfnUsIsMJ4Tosdz2bsA2gkBH/70GI6i/lfX2OyIy9PEWu7tVreMYcTWxjUnP/a7hjFQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1629:b029:2ef:f4de:244f with SMTP id e9-20020a056a001629b02902eff4de244fmr13756636pfc.6.1623514548939; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 09:15:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (99-152-116-91.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [99.152.116.91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z6sm8706626pfr.99.2021.06.12.09.15.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 12 Jun 2021 09:15:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 08:59:53 -0700 From: Olof Johansson To: Daniel Palmer List-Id: Cc: Arnd Bergmann , arm@kernel.org, SoC Team , Romain Perier , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Mohammed Billoo Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: mstar for v5.14 Message-ID: <20210612155953.GA11724@lx2k> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 12:09:56PM +0900, Daniel Palmer wrote: > Hi Arnd, Olof, > > This is my first time doing this so apologies in advance if I've messed this up. > Anyhow, we have two very small patches for 5.14. Overall this is the right way to do it, but my tooling spotted a miss: You didn't sign off on at least one of the patches you applied (the UART one). Make sure you do 'git am -s' or similar so you have a S-o-b entry when you're the one applying the patch. Mind respinning the pull request with that corrected, so we avoid getting an email from Stephen Rothwell about it too? :) Beyond that, keeping an eye on how you sort patches when you have more material: In particular we keep DT, soc, drivers and defconfig updates in separate branches as much as we can -- sometimes dt-bindings need to be in both DT and driver branches, for example. That doesn't apply to this pull request, since the MAINTAINERS entry and the other one fix are fine to bundle (they would end up in the 'soc' branch at our end). We can tweak that over time as you get more familiar with how we separate the streams of patches. -Olof