From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E58C49360 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 01:09:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CF3611CE for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 01:09:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232281AbhFNBL7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jun 2021 21:11:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51354 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232212AbhFNBL6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jun 2021 21:11:58 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x434.google.com (mail-pf1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::434]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F30D6C061574; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 18:09:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x434.google.com with SMTP id y15so9337602pfl.4; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 18:09:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=lfTRNFalgvE8W3BaBubJpxlJYdBX6Ni/M9RnLGhDGdg=; b=giJUOc64A/HReLaviyDuLGgkjEioiHD2twGRkxCH2mil9TuqvPeHO8TPDcMQ3LUbT7 xJA7Jozne4xmbp/w3x68hJ/5VyG/u/3TfbBTeRqEuU335lR7KTMDYoRDIDGaIm/28JMO fzI6R38pdIBZo6Xv3uU13gxuzQvLcEMMlfekdSOe2HOk6wSR3ZzG55RYaVaKCD/3xRWT WNiFFUleWT83HkijsPXrc6vgjgkz+XOzeQRY6wEYN6bMKtBR51hLBcTHZwWVsrZdBSKU 1tVH1T4KDxLoyBk1RFZ/6ZHd7OVBi1vN6jI96lGEGNU5bhzlKiy2958fW2BSQQun3pug fbnw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=lfTRNFalgvE8W3BaBubJpxlJYdBX6Ni/M9RnLGhDGdg=; b=qMjS+567kRE8ath1u7eGUexIjbIJeNUvdj3Snq+g15E0YxQ0RP5d6fUX8/A4PZAutd qITZ0tqWE3pVJRAFDnsZ41sLMlrR7yAS6zWORc2w2L9xeKjqdBUe6aLH5S08o1q6t7va HAZxedVroTPZC7LB4s9u/fDpxyWY3CwudN5oqyvcE94UqcKVzwKoGWfA60sGmZqmturC /KOCuQR9TIdNQ6El5RfvabxuSed061/XlZ0u7Bn+c0HkW59KmVOyHK1/zHzSL/rmId1N ot+Gvk/kNgc1gV9T5QDwLrboc1DpFLbbzh5w0KsxHAcsK3D174in0dHcJ+biTFH9Zqds zyPg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531oEryIDIO4OeS58hi3FCeDwh5Ngdnr03eOqTBFlkzelp5jNHlJ HQ0+nEe/va12zqskVsir+64= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyXxemMmvRcWWFjy/8zrZR5cT5hqRdDgziWJi6fwTFTllyV7zTq3nilU3KOGZZEE747GyXaig== X-Received: by 2002:a63:5f46:: with SMTP id t67mr14925506pgb.37.1623632980544; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 18:09:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.google.com ([141.164.41.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t1sm10303269pjs.20.2021.06.13.18.09.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 13 Jun 2021 18:09:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:09:29 +0800 From: Changbin Du To: kernel test robot Cc: Changbin Du , Eric Van Hensbergen , Latchesar Ionkov , Dominique Martinet , kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] 9p: add support for root file systems Message-ID: <20210614010929.mwvmpdy3dv7k2xnh@mail.google.com> References: <20210606230922.77268-2-changbin.du@gmail.com> <202106070913.SLIBAxBQ-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202106070913.SLIBAxBQ-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 09:06:54AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > Hi Changbin, > > I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: > > [auto build test WARNING on lwn/docs-next] > [also build test WARNING on linus/master v5.13-rc5 next-20210604] > [cannot apply to v9fs/for-next] > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Changbin-Du/9p-add-support-for-root-file-systems/20210607-071229 > base: git://git.lwn.net/linux-2.6 docs-next > config: arm-allyesconfig (attached as .config) > compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0 > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/96098f751038703cc0fda4f018236d240a86930d > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux > git fetch --no-tags linux-review Changbin-Du/9p-add-support-for-root-file-systems/20210607-071229 > git checkout 96098f751038703cc0fda4f018236d240a86930d > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=arm > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > Reported-by: kernel test robot > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > >> fs/9p/v9fsroot.c:53:12: warning: no previous prototype for 'v9fs_root_data' [-Wmissing-prototypes] > 53 | int __init v9fs_root_data(char **dev, char **opts) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > This just follows the existing rootfs support manner. This function doesn't have a dedicated header file to place. So I think we can ignore this warning. > > vim +/v9fs_root_data +53 fs/9p/v9fsroot.c > > 52 > > 53 int __init v9fs_root_data(char **dev, char **opts) > > --- > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org -- Cheers, Changbin Du