From: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
To: anton@tuxera.com
Cc: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>,
linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
syzbot+213ac8bb98f7f4420840@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] ntfs: Fix validity check for file name attribute
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 13:05:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210614050540.289494-1-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> (raw)
When checking the file name attribute, we want to ensure that it fits
within the bounds of ATTR_RECORD. To do this, we should check
that (attr record + file name offset + file name length) < (attr
record + attr record length).
However, the original check did not include the file name offset in
the calculation. This means that corrupted on-disk metadata might not
caught by the incorrect file name check, and lead to an invalid memory
access.
An example can be seen in the crash report of a memory corruption
error found by Syzbot:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=a1a1e379b225812688566745c3e2f7242bffc246
Adding the file name offset to the validity check fixes this error and
passes the Syzbot reproducer test.
Reported-by: syzbot+213ac8bb98f7f4420840@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+213ac8bb98f7f4420840@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
---
fs/ntfs/inode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ntfs/inode.c b/fs/ntfs/inode.c
index f5c058b3192c..4474adb393ca 100644
--- a/fs/ntfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ntfs/inode.c
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ static int ntfs_is_extended_system_file(ntfs_attr_search_ctx *ctx)
}
file_name_attr = (FILE_NAME_ATTR*)((u8*)attr +
le16_to_cpu(attr->data.resident.value_offset));
- p2 = (u8*)attr + le32_to_cpu(attr->data.resident.value_length);
+ p2 = (u8 *)file_name_attr + le32_to_cpu(attr->data.resident.value_length);
if (p2 < (u8*)attr || p2 > p)
goto err_corrupt_attr;
/* This attribute is ok, but is it in the $Extend directory? */
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-06-14 5:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-14 5:05 Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi [this message]
2021-06-28 2:45 ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
2021-06-28 9:22 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2021-06-28 9:22 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2021-07-29 8:31 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2021-07-29 11:56 ` Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210614050540.289494-1-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com \
--to=desmondcheongzx@gmail.com \
--cc=anton@tuxera.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=syzbot+213ac8bb98f7f4420840@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®