mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Werner Sembach <wse@tuxedocomputers.com>
To: harry.wentland@amd.com, sunpeng.li@amd.com,
	alexander.deucher@amd.com, christian.koenig@amd.com,
	airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch,
	maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
	tzimmermann@suse.de, jani.nikula@linux.intel.com,
	joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 00/14] New uAPI drm properties for color management
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:14:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210615141426.6001-1-wse@tuxedocomputers.com> (raw)

I started work on my proposal for better color handling in Linux display
drivers: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/5/12/764

In this 3rd revision everything except the generalised Broadcast RGB
implementation is included. I did however not yet include everything suggested
in the feedback for v1 and v2.

I rebased the patch series on drm-tip to have the latest changes in i915's
YCbCr420 handling and to make the intel-gfx ci not fail on merge anymore.

The read only properties are now correctly marked as immutable.

Some questions I already have:

I think Broadcast RGB is really no good name for the property as, at least in
theory, YCbCr can also be "Limited" or "Full". Should the new implementation
have a different name and make "Broadcast RGB" an alias for it? I propose
"preferred color range" as the new name.

I have not tested dp mst (both on AMD and Intel) as i have no adapter for it at
hand. If one can test it, please let me know if things break or not.

I found the DRM_MODE_PROP_ATOMIC flag and from the documentation it sounds like
"max bpc" (and "preferred color format" and "Broadcast RGB") should have it. Is
there a reason it doesn't?

I have not yet looked into dsc and dithering behaviour.

I have already submitted the first two patches separately to the lkml as they fix
potential bugs and don't introduce new uAPI.


             reply	other threads:[~2021-06-15 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-15 14:14 Werner Sembach [this message]
2021-06-15 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] drm/amd/display: Remove unnecessary SIGNAL_TYPE_HDMI_TYPE_A check Werner Sembach
2021-06-15 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] drm/amd/display: Add missing cases convert_dc_color_depth_into_bpc Werner Sembach
2021-06-15 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] drm/uAPI: Add "active bpc" as feedback channel for "max bpc" drm property Werner Sembach
2021-06-15 17:33   ` Werner Sembach
2021-06-15 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] drm/amd/display: Add handling for new "active bpc" property Werner Sembach
2021-06-15 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] drm/i915/display: " Werner Sembach
2021-06-15 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] drm/uAPI: Add "active color format" drm property as feedback for userspace Werner Sembach
2021-06-15 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] drm/amd/display: Add handling for new "active color format" property Werner Sembach
2021-06-15 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] drm/i915/display: " Werner Sembach
2021-06-15 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] drm/uAPI: Add "active color range" drm property as feedback for userspace Werner Sembach
2021-06-15 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] drm/amd/display: Add handling for new "active color range" property Werner Sembach
2021-06-15 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] drm/i915/display: " Werner Sembach
2021-06-15 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] drm/uAPI: Add "preferred color format" drm property as setting for userspace Werner Sembach
2021-06-15 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] drm/amd/display: Add handling for new "preferred color format" property Werner Sembach
2021-06-15 14:14 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] drm/i915/display: " Werner Sembach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210615141426.6001-1-wse@tuxedocomputers.com \
    --to=wse@tuxedocomputers.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=harry.wentland@amd.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=sunpeng.li@amd.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®