From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Cc: richard@nod.at, yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
houtao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ubifs: Fix races between xattr_{set|get} and listxattr operations
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:23:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210616082327.GP9782@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210531125210.1173922-2-chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Hi,
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 08:52:09PM +0800, Zhihao Cheng wrote:
> UBIFS may occur some problems with concurrent xattr_{set|get} and
> listxattr operations, such as assertion failure, memory corruption,
> stale xattr value[1].
>
> Fix it by importing a new rw-lock in @ubifs_inode to serilize write
> operations on xattr, concurrent read operations are still effective,
> just like ext4.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200630130438.141649-1-houtao1@huawei.com
I had a closer look at it and reviewed that you carefully release the
lock where you claimed it. I can't tell if adding this lock is the right
approach, but for what it's worth you can add my
Reviewed-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> --- a/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h
> @@ -356,6 +356,7 @@ struct ubifs_gced_idx_leb {
> * @ui_mutex: serializes inode write-back with the rest of VFS operations,
> * serializes "clean <-> dirty" state changes, serializes bulk-read,
> * protects @dirty, @bulk_read, @ui_size, and @xattr_size
> + * @xattr_sem: serilizes write operations (remove|set|create) on xattr
s/serilizes/serializes/
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-16 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-31 12:52 [PATCH 0/2] ubifs: Fixes for xattr concurrent operations Zhihao Cheng
2021-05-31 12:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] ubifs: Fix races between xattr_{set|get} and listxattr operations Zhihao Cheng
2021-06-16 8:23 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2021-05-31 12:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] ubifs: Remove ui_mutex in ubifs_xattr_get and change_xattr Zhihao Cheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210616082327.GP9782@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®