From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81783C4338F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 12:48:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5627060F59 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 12:48:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234160AbhGZMIS (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 08:08:18 -0400 Received: from smtpbg127.qq.com ([109.244.180.96]:24119 "EHLO smtpbg.qq.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234049AbhGZMIR (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jul 2021 08:08:17 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 446 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 08:08:16 EDT X-QQ-mid: bizesmtp43t1627303183t6lqoppg Received: from ficus.lan (unknown [171.223.99.141]) by esmtp6.qq.com (ESMTP) with id ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 20:39:41 +0800 (CST) X-QQ-SSF: 0100000000200090B000B00A0000000 X-QQ-FEAT: qYS6qym2pYeA45yuN4nf/+aDG2t5kxly0vXseIOnyJAdhOXtqqrlYVX0DqAXj HjsMS/+Yju9KyMHlnENhRw9iHmHr23npeWov34zQGeviijgSkN78afe/mzNqikKWtMfUo+C B81FNupkGjVcRtk+/23gUkNoDSsbyhFOPH2uj01fzuaGxOrdTfqj3uOPQbXGGsAqKghnDXL 1nwhbLmUFnsoKB365S7MFEqc+XZEdUtM3ju5b7JGVziEXrdWhnxaFTVuwSowtZ+43umxHBD kMJnRANN+UNt8+bkj/4QvHhJFUWiVggD3+ARqugnfgbIwXn5K2K36l/iSvzPScMmVIY+/zh tht4bbGz9kGuwdXLzsdsmYAV52o9w== X-QQ-GoodBg: 0 From: Jason Wang To: catalin.marinas@arm.com Cc: will@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, amit.kachhap@arm.com, dbrazdil@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Wang Subject: [PATCH] arm64: unnecessary end 'return;' in void functions Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 20:39:40 +0800 Message-Id: <20210726123940.63232-1-wangborong@cdjrlc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520 Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:cdjrlc.com:qybgspam:qybgspam1 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The end 'return;' in a void function is useless and verbose. It can be removed safely. Signed-off-by: Jason Wang --- arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index 0ead8bfedf20..23c3456f0aa2 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -1561,8 +1561,6 @@ kpti_install_ng_mappings(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *__unused) if (!cpu) arm64_use_ng_mappings = true; - - return; } #else static void -- 2.32.0