From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D97C4320E for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 13:10:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1276D60F02 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 13:10:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236288AbhG1NKQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:10:16 -0400 Received: from mail.zeus.flokli.de ([88.198.15.28]:39370 "EHLO zeus.flokli.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235942AbhG1NKP (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:10:15 -0400 Received: from localhost (80-62-116-241-mobile.dk.customer.tdc.net [80.62.116.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: flokli@flokli.de) by zeus.flokli.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63CF51151A51; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 13:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:10:10 +0200 From: Florian Klink To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Moritz Fischer , Matthias Schiffer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gabriel.kh.huang@fii-na.com, moritzf@google.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, Mathias Nyman , Vinod Koul , Justin Forbes , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "usb: renesas-xhci: Fix handling of unknown ROM state" Message-ID: <20210728131010.v42ocedxt2tg5hbb@tp.flokli.de> References: <20210719070519.41114-1-mdf@kernel.org> <20210728123755.md5zvbeeop3shmve@tp.flokli.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> > I'll put up an RFC in the next couple of days ... >> >> Is the RFC already out somewhere? >> >> Regardless of that, maybe we should push the trivial revert to >> linux-stable first, so users don't run into this unexpectedly. > >It's already merged in the stable trees, right? It's in 5.13.6, which was pushed 27mins ago ;-) Thanks! Florian