mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com, paulmck@kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, dvyukov@google.com, glider@google.com,
	boqun.feng@gmail.com, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/8] kcsan: test: Fix flaky test case
Date: Mon,  9 Aug 2021 13:25:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210809112516.682816-4-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210809112516.682816-1-elver@google.com>

If CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_VALUE_CHANGE_ONLY=n, then we may also see data
races between the writers only. If we get unlucky and never capture a
read-write data race, but only the write-write data races, then the
test_no_value_change* test cases may incorrectly fail.

The second problem is that the initial value needs to be reset, as
otherwise we might actually observe a value change at the start.

Fix it by also looking for the write-write data races, and resetting the
value to what will be written.

Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
 kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c b/kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c
index d93f226327af..e282c1166373 100644
--- a/kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c
+++ b/kernel/kcsan/kcsan_test.c
@@ -493,17 +493,24 @@ static void test_concurrent_races(struct kunit *test)
 __no_kcsan
 static void test_novalue_change(struct kunit *test)
 {
-	const struct expect_report expect = {
+	const struct expect_report expect_rw = {
 		.access = {
 			{ test_kernel_write_nochange, &test_var, sizeof(test_var), KCSAN_ACCESS_WRITE },
 			{ test_kernel_read, &test_var, sizeof(test_var), 0 },
 		},
 	};
+	const struct expect_report expect_ww = {
+		.access = {
+			{ test_kernel_write_nochange, &test_var, sizeof(test_var), KCSAN_ACCESS_WRITE },
+			{ test_kernel_write_nochange, &test_var, sizeof(test_var), KCSAN_ACCESS_WRITE },
+		},
+	};
 	bool match_expect = false;
 
+	test_kernel_write_nochange(); /* Reset value. */
 	begin_test_checks(test_kernel_write_nochange, test_kernel_read);
 	do {
-		match_expect = report_matches(&expect);
+		match_expect = report_matches(&expect_rw) || report_matches(&expect_ww);
 	} while (!end_test_checks(match_expect));
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_VALUE_CHANGE_ONLY))
 		KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, match_expect);
@@ -518,17 +525,24 @@ static void test_novalue_change(struct kunit *test)
 __no_kcsan
 static void test_novalue_change_exception(struct kunit *test)
 {
-	const struct expect_report expect = {
+	const struct expect_report expect_rw = {
 		.access = {
 			{ test_kernel_write_nochange_rcu, &test_var, sizeof(test_var), KCSAN_ACCESS_WRITE },
 			{ test_kernel_read, &test_var, sizeof(test_var), 0 },
 		},
 	};
+	const struct expect_report expect_ww = {
+		.access = {
+			{ test_kernel_write_nochange_rcu, &test_var, sizeof(test_var), KCSAN_ACCESS_WRITE },
+			{ test_kernel_write_nochange_rcu, &test_var, sizeof(test_var), KCSAN_ACCESS_WRITE },
+		},
+	};
 	bool match_expect = false;
 
+	test_kernel_write_nochange_rcu(); /* Reset value. */
 	begin_test_checks(test_kernel_write_nochange_rcu, test_kernel_read);
 	do {
-		match_expect = report_matches(&expect);
+		match_expect = report_matches(&expect_rw) || report_matches(&expect_ww);
 	} while (!end_test_checks(match_expect));
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, match_expect);
 }
-- 
2.32.0.605.g8dce9f2422-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-09 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-09 11:25 [PATCH 0/8] kcsan: Cleanups and fix reporting for scoped accesses Marco Elver
2021-08-09 11:25 ` [PATCH 1/8] kcsan: test: Defer kcsan_test_init() after kunit initialization Marco Elver
2021-08-09 11:25 ` [PATCH 2/8] kcsan: test: Use kunit_skip() to skip tests Marco Elver
2021-08-09 11:25 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2021-08-09 11:25 ` [PATCH 4/8] kcsan: Add ability to pass instruction pointer of access to reporting Marco Elver
2021-08-09 11:25 ` [PATCH 5/8] kcsan: Save instruction pointer for scoped accesses Marco Elver
2021-08-09 11:25 ` [PATCH 6/8] kcsan: Start stack trace with explicit location if provided Marco Elver
2021-08-09 11:25 ` [PATCH 7/8] kcsan: Support reporting scoped read-write access type Marco Elver
2021-08-09 11:25 ` [PATCH 8/8] kcsan: Move ctx to start of argument list Marco Elver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210809112516.682816-4-elver@google.com \
    --to=elver@google.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®