From: "Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com>
To: <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH resend] vsock/virtio: avoid potential deadlock when vsock device remove
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 13:30:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210812053056.1699-1-longpeng2@huawei.com> (raw)
There's a potential deadlock case when remove the vsock device or
process the RESET event:
vsock_for_each_connected_socket:
spin_lock_bh(&vsock_table_lock) ----------- (1)
...
virtio_vsock_reset_sock:
lock_sock(sk) --------------------- (2)
...
spin_unlock_bh(&vsock_table_lock)
lock_sock() may do initiative schedule when the 'sk' is owned by
other thread at the same time, we would receivce a warning message
that "scheduling while atomic".
Even worse, if the next task (selected by the scheduler) try to
release a 'sk', it need to request vsock_table_lock and the deadlock
occur, cause the system into softlockup state.
Call trace:
queued_spin_lock_slowpath
vsock_remove_bound
vsock_remove_sock
virtio_transport_release
__vsock_release
vsock_release
__sock_release
sock_close
__fput
____fput
So we should not require sk_lock in this case, just like the behavior
in vhost_vsock or vmci.
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com>
---
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
index e0c2c99..4f7c99d 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
@@ -357,11 +357,14 @@ static void virtio_vsock_event_fill(struct virtio_vsock *vsock)
static void virtio_vsock_reset_sock(struct sock *sk)
{
- lock_sock(sk);
+ /* vmci_transport.c doesn't take sk_lock here either. At least we're
+ * under vsock_table_lock so the sock cannot disappear while we're
+ * executing.
+ */
+
sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
sk->sk_err = ECONNRESET;
sk_error_report(sk);
- release_sock(sk);
}
static void virtio_vsock_update_guest_cid(struct virtio_vsock *vsock)
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-08-12 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-12 5:30 Longpeng(Mike) [this message]
2021-08-12 8:03 ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-08-12 17:59 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210812053056.1699-1-longpeng2@huawei.com \
--to=longpeng2@huawei.com \
--cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®