From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6AF9C4320A for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 19:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C725360F3A for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 19:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233263AbhH3TTH (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 15:19:07 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34006 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229950AbhH3TTG (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 15:19:06 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C6C960238; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 19:18:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1630351092; bh=IsJ1eyte8pqC29zpTwrvhMUn8oR4aDRp/oA5dY+oUu8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZOIega9sXyUc6icmBUCBKQUmiGY76J1k5FwUpJ7qL+jkDIJQK7EOxN5Vk3J9v6oP5 wz/jCi0AU7ibfsGTGm6wTydszncqEcoxohUn0gawaYxaTYuHOJAvnYafTa5/+J64Q/ WySko4GOPnjhWjQPR9yUgpOtG4m+07KcDyxBQBVM2Z/akNPtc82J/F3zCadJCl70DE 7JKRrCeT6UkK//jdwTX/a2DcuBd01jK3GO36awGyaPMHzy3hQt7DuItHjRByWtd398 i5vxKJK7QZqHhr9De8FatGMFnAAqJODwy2ug3e9qdi57OWZrlymXu+aV1k6Zk01zwd 3AF2lKHmRpNIw== Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:18:10 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Sergio =?iso-8859-1?Q?Migu=E9ns?= Iglesias Cc: konrad.wilk@oracle.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jgross@suse.com, sstabellini@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sergio =?iso-8859-1?Q?Migu=E9ns?= Iglesias Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xen/pcifront: Removed unnecessary __ref annotation Message-ID: <20210830191810.GA13209@bjorn-Precision-5520> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20210830201426.g2vaxh6chqnprual@archlap> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 10:14:26PM +0200, Sergio Miguéns Iglesias wrote: > Thanks again for you answers! > I am lerning a lot from your replys and I really appreciate it. Should I > make a v3 patch and split that one into 2 different patches or would it > be confusing? > > I don't want to take more of your time with poor patches so I don't know > if I should resend this one. If it's already applied, it doesn't matter for this case. But in this situation I would generally post a v3 incorporating the feedback. To be respectful of reviewers' time, try to avoid posting more than one or two revisions per week. As long as you tag reposts appropriately with v2, v3, etc (as you did), there's no confusion. It's nice if you include a note about what changed between v1 and v2 in the cover letter or below the "---" line as was done here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/8f9a13ac-8ab1-15ac-06cb-c131b488a36f@siemens.com/